I am so confused. I don’t know who to believe–those who claim that the “unpopular” Hugo Chavez can be used as a secret weapon to push even more unpopular “free” trade agreements through (“You don’t like him? Great! Vote for this and stick it to him!”) or those who admit, however reluctantly and backhandedly, that Chavecito (or anyone who shares his ideas) actually enjoys considerable popularity outside Venezuela.
Damn crapaganda whores, can’t they at least agree amongst themselves on a coherent story?