Dear Abby: WTF?

rape-culture-t-shirt

I went to protest rape culture, and all I got was this crappy t-shirt.

Advice columnists have a lot of power to shape our opinions. Or misshape them, as the case may be. Case in point: a recent Dear Abby column, in which the advice columnist — the daughter of the original “Abby” — has inadvertently gone the rape-culture route. “Uncertain in Illinois” wrote to her recently, seeking clarification as much as advice:

DEAR ABBY: I am a junior in high school. Last year, a guy I have known for two years began showing a sexual interest in me. I rejected his advances. Last week, he began expressing his interest again, letting me know he wanted to have sex. He invited me to study — only study — but said we “might” make out.

I was a virgin and had never even kissed anyone before. I had just gotten out of a relationship that didn’t end very well, so I liked the attention. I decided I was fine with just kissing, but as soon as I got in his truck, he started to feel me up. He took me to a semi-isolated area and we ended up having sex. It wasn’t fun or pleasurable. I told him he was hurting me, but he didn’t stop until the third time I said it. He was very upset with me. He only cared about me pleasuring him.

I told two of my close friends about what happened. One said he had essentially raped me. The other said it doesn’t count as rape because even though I said it hurt, I didn’t say it forcefully enough. Abby, what do you think?

The first friend is “essentially” right: This is a rape. The guy telegraphed his intent beforehand, and the girl made it clear that she didn’t want him. But he persisted. He lied to her. He isolated her. And then, when he had her alone, he attacked. And didn’t stop until the third time she told him that he was hurting her. He wasn’t a bit remorseful even then, just “very upset” with her for not letting him finish.

At no point did he care what she wanted. It couldn’t be more clear that this guy raped her, and meant to rape her all along. And that she — a virgin who hadn’t even kissed anyone yet — could hardly have known what was going to happen if she went anywhere with him.

But Dear Abby seems to have taken the second friend’s side, the side that holds the victim should have known, and is thus at least partly responsible for what happened to her:

DEAR UNCERTAIN: It appears you and that boy had a severe breakdown in communication, which led to your being sexually assaulted. He had made no secret that he wanted sex with you, and may have interpreted your willingness to kiss him after he took you somewhere other than what was agreed upon as a signal that you were willing, even though you didn’t say so.

Date rape happens when a fellow ends up coercing or forcing a girl to have sex without her consent. Unless a girl explicitly expresses her willingness to proceed, it is the responsibility of the boy NOT to proceed.

To me what happened illustrates how important it is for parents to talk to their sons and daughters about responsible behavior because failure to do that can have lifelong consequences for both. If you haven’t already done so, you should tell your parents what happened. However, if you don’t feel safe doing that, tell a counselor at school.

Did you spot the rape culture in there? It’s tricky, because it’s all mixed up with what would, on its own, be sound advice. So here is the sound advice, on its own:

DEAR UNCERTAIN: Date rape happens when a fellow ends up coercing or forcing a girl to have sex without her consent. Unless a girl explicitly expresses her willingness to proceed, it is the responsibility of the boy NOT to proceed. If you haven’t already done so, you should tell your parents what happened. However, if you don’t feel safe doing that, tell a counselor at school.

And here is the rape culture:

It appears you and that boy had a severe breakdown in communication, which led to your being sexually assaulted. He had made no secret that he wanted sex with you, and may have interpreted your willingness to kiss him after he took you somewhere other than what was agreed upon as a signal that you were willing, even though you didn’t say so.

To me what happened illustrates how important it is for parents to talk to their sons and daughters about responsible behavior because failure to do that can have lifelong consequences for both.

See, that’s the problem with rape culture: Too many mixed messages! Shit happens when you fail to communicate just right! You have to be clear and unambiguous at all times.

And here’s the fucked-up part: Even if you make your true feelings known, someone can still willfully misread you, choosing to disregard whatever doesn’t suit his original intent, and proceeding according to plan. Just as the guy who raped “Uncertain” did.

And now it’s going to have “lifelong consequences for both”, all right: “Uncertain” going to spend the rest of her life feeling, well, uncertain, and terribly guilty for not having “communicated” correctly. And possibly also for “ruining his life”, if she decides to press charges and he is prosecuted for sexual assault.

Outside of the doubtful legal ramifications, though, it’s quite certain what consequences this guy will face. Because we live in a patriarchal society that elevates male whims above the will of any female, he will be exonerated in the court of public opinion. And he will be aided and abetted by those who have internalized misogyny, like Friend #2, who thinks it was up to “Uncertain” to push him away forcefully enough, and that if she didn’t, she must have wanted it after all. Patriarchy and rape culture thrive on uncertainty, especially when it falls in a direction advantageous to the rapist.

And the worst part is, he’s even got Dear Abby to back him up. Because she can’t communicate clearly and unambiguously, either.

Share this story:
Posted in If You REALLY Care, Isn't That Illegal?, The United States of Amnesia, The WTF? Files | Comments Off on Dear Abby: WTF?

Glass houses, Padre.

poleo-exposes-palmar

Well, well. What have we here? A Venezuelan priest — and member of the right-wing opposition — receiving a cheque via Wells Fargo, from Canada of all places? Yup. And he was exposed by someone on the same political side as he, no less:

The opposition priest from Zulia, José Palmar, known for harshly criticizing corruption and attacking the revolutionary government, is now in the eye of the hurricane for appearing in the Panama Papers leaks, where it was found that he holds a bank account with more than $18 million US.

The denunciation comes from right-wing journalist Rafael Poleo, in his column “Short and Deep”, wherein he shows proofs of illicit acts on the part of the parish priest of the Guadalupe Church in Sierra Maestra, San Francisco municipality. It appears that he used a charitable association, called “Children of Zulia”, opened in 2008.

“It doesn’t surprise me that functionaries of the Venezuelan government are involved in the corruption mentioned in the documents of the Panama Papers. What does surprise me is that in those documents, there are known opposition members, who criticized the government a great deal, among them Father José Palmar,” Poleo comments.

However, in spite of the investigation under way against him, the fractious priest has not ceased to attack the government; today, on his Twitter account, @PadreJosePalmar, he wrote: “All the ‘plugged-in’ Chavistas who appear in the Panama Papers are crooks who take advantage of the national treasury to get rich.”

Translation mine. Link added.

You know that old saying about those who live in glass houses, and throwing stones, right? Well, it also applies to people living in “humble parish houses” and under a vow of poverty:

palmar-casa-humilde

“Those who accuse me of having ties to the Panama Papers, I tell them: I live in a humble parish house built by Jesuits.”

Of course, it’s quite possible to live in such a house, and yet still have a foreign bank account; no rules against that except said vow of poverty!

And a few tweets later, he goes on in, very unpriestly language:

palmar-hijueputa

“I don’t know any charitable organization called Children of Zulia, but I know one in Miraflores Palace called SONS OF BITCHES.”

Tsk, tsk. Kiss your statues of the Virgin with that mouth, Padre?

As you can see, the padre’s tweeter is a hoot; he’s spinning defensively and presenting heavily redacted messages, ostensibly from the Canadian and US embassies, as proof that he’s been…framed?

palmar-can-ambassador-tweet

palmar-us-charge-d-affaires-tweet

And retweets of Rafael Poleo claiming that he, too, was somehow…set up?

poleo-retraction-tweets

¿Qué h’éso?

Of course, like all members of the Venezuelan opposition, these two are complete sinvergüenzas — shameless people, both chronic and pathological liars, who think nothing of libelling their own government on the regular (and on the tweeter). They claim there’s no freedom of expression in Venezuela, while indulging in it routinely to a degree that would never be tolerated by the government of Canada OR that of the US. If they said such awful things about PM Trudeau or President Obama, they’d be arrested.

But it really is funny to watch them spin, isn’t it?

Share this story:
Posted in A Man, A Plan, A Canal, Canadian Counterpunch, Crapagandarati, Do As I Say..., Fascism Without Swastikas, Filthy Stinking Rich, Huguito Chavecito, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Illegal?, Pissing Jesus Off, Schadenfreude, The United States of Amnesia | Comments Off on Glass houses, Padre.

This does not bode well.

If you’re hoping that the myriads of corruptos named in the Panama Papers will be brought to justice, Switzerland has some bad news for you:

Switzerland has sentenced a former bank IT employee referred to as the “Edward Snowden of tax evasion” to five years in prison for leaking records on 106,000 account holders, including about 1,800 from Canada, in a move that led to billions of dollars in unpaid taxes being recovered by countries around the world.

Whistleblower Hervé Falciani, a former head of computer security at HSBC’s private banking arm in Geneva, was sentenced in absentia Friday after being convicted of corporate espionage for taking records that showed the bank helped hide the equivalent of $255 billion of clients’ money.

[…]

In a 2010 interview with CBC News in Nice, France, he said he was driven by profound qualms about the secrecy of the Swiss banking industry and how it enabled wealthy people around the world to shield money from tax authorities.

“I came to the point that something was very wrong and should be changed,” he said. “A huge industry is made just to go around rules that we can’t go around as simple citizens.”

[…]

The Falciani revelations were among the first in a series of leaks of offshore banking data in recent years that have exposed how wealthy people worldwide use networks of secret accounts and shell corporations to hide income and avoid or evade tax.

But Swiss authorities and HSBC have maintained that Falciani’s actions amounted to theft. He was finally charged last December following a six-year investigation, with the country’s attorney general alleging Falciani was motivated by profit and tried to sell the account info he took.

A month prior, France had indicted HSBC on allegations the bank helped launder the proceeds of tax fraud through the same Swiss private banking accounts.

A separate Swiss investigation into HSBC resulted in the bank paying a $53-million settlement and avoiding criminal charges. Switzerland has not charged any HSBC bankers or executives.

U.S. and Belgian authorities are still looking into the bank.

Canada never brought tax evasion charges against any of HSBC’s Canadian account holders.

How many millions — or billions — of unpaid taxes does this mean for Canada? Nobody knows the precise figure yet. But if you’re wondering who enabled this, Stephen Fucking Harper‘s name comes up a lot. He was no friend of the common Canadian, but a very good buddy of the ultra-privileged tax evader who is only a Canadian of convenience.

And while these high-level criminals are going chronically unpunished, those who expose them are being sentenced to prison in absentia. Lovely.

Whoever blew the whistle on Mossack Fonseca, I can now understand why they chose not to be identified. This is probably just a hint of what’s in store for them. And Panamanian prisons are undoubtedly a lot uglier than their Swiss counterparts.

Share this story:
Posted in A Man, A Plan, A Canal, Canadian Counterpunch, Economics for Dummies, EuroPeons, Filthy Stinking Rich, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land, No Good Deed Goes Unpunished | Comments Off on This does not bode well.

Music for a Sunday: While we wait for spring…

…and for it to finally stop snowing, let’s listen to the founding foremother of rock show us how it’s done:

According to YouTube, this video was shot live in Manchester, England. I haven’t seen anyone else use an actual train station for a live venue, have you?

Share this story:
Posted in Music for a Sunday | Comments Off on Music for a Sunday: While we wait for spring…

Wankers of the Week: Panama Poopers

this-looting-is-nothing.jpg

Crappy weekend, everyone! Well, how about them Panama Papers? The fun’s just begun, and already my head is swimming. Yours too? Well, give it a shake, because there will be miles to go — and reams of data to sort through — before all the confetti settles. Thankfully, though, they’re not the only game in town — and this week, for fun and frivolity, we have:

1. Scottie Nell Fucking Hughes. Yes, everyone, you MUST shed a tear for Der Drumpf’s head cheerleader. Her own daughter had to find out the hard way — by watching Saturday Night Live — that her mother was too dumb to raise her. Could be worse, sweetie — you could be black and get your daughter taken away from you by Children’s Aid — and go on probation for eighteen fucking years — just for leaving her unattended in the car while you went to interview for a REAL job!

2. Paul Fucking LePage. Look who took a leaf from Harpo’s book and decided that spitefully hiding in the closet was the better part of valor. Literally!

3. Louie Fucking Gohmert. Girls’ education? Why, that’s a sin! Everybody knows it’s the nature of wimmin to be ignorant and uneducated and know shit-all about science, like Gomer and the Good Lord intended!

male-brain.jpg

4. Theodore Fucking Shoebat. What’s this? Oh, nothing. Just Bat Guano taking hits off his meth pipe and babbling nonsense as usual. One of these days, I swear, his profile is gonna appear on Grindr or some other gay dating site. The smell of mothballs is strong about this one…

5. Sarah Fucking Palin. What’s this? Oh, nothing. Just Caribou Barbie, gettin’ drunk off her ass again and babbling nonsense while posing with dead animals.

6. Dylan Fucking Perara. Diddums. You thought that LIBERALS were the ones with the thin skins and the inability to live outside of safe zones? Trust me, they got nothing on the Drumpf ‘wingers. This one can’t even handle disagreement. Or accurate labelling of his politics. Which makes you wonder how he’d take it if anyone ever really chewed him out.

science-vs.-religion.jpg

7. Scott Fucking Baio. Chachi, Chachi, Chachi…your waa-waa-waa is going woo-woo-woo again. Just because you’re not smart enough to recognize the actual signs of climate change (which is happening, and faster than you think), doesn’t mean it’s not, you know, ACTUALLY HAPPENING.

8. Peg Fucking Littleton. And in other news of ‘wingers not smart enough to science, we have this one…who thinks that only God can cause earthquakes, and fracking can’t. Someone please get her a bottle of frackwater so she can see more concrete proof that cutting environmental funding is a bad fucking idea.

9. Davis Fucking Aurini. Finally, the truth comes out…and one of the two perma-feuding makers of The Sarkeesian Effect admits that he never even watched any of the videos made by the woman he’s claiming to debunk! Which makes you wonder what he did with all that sweet, sweet Patreon cash his suckers sent him. Booze? Smokes? A little plastic skull for every room, to impress all the ladies he’s paying to come home with him? The possibilities are endless!

pua-garbagemen.jpg

10. Azealia Fucking Banks. No. No. No. Just NO! I agree with you that #5 is a shithead, but you do not wish rape on anyone. Especially not based on a fake news story.

11. Dale Fucking Lyons. Feminism is “the cancer of mankind”? No, CANCER is the cancer of mankind, same as it is in many other species besides. And in your case, your own masculist stupidity is the death of your crappy metal band. Instant karma. Ha, ha.

12. Miranda Fucking Lambert. Why?

miranda-lambert-gun-shoes.jpg

That’s why. Glamorizing “open carry” is about the ugliest fashion statement ever. (Not to mention those clashing colors! Ugh.)

13. John Fucking Abbott. It’s getting awfully hard to tell the jihadis apart from the anti-jihadis in Australia these days; both of them seem to hate women equally, and in the same ways.

14. Jim Fucking Bakker. The government isn’t in the business of “storming” studios and arresting Jesus hucksters for peddling lies and buckets of gross dehydrated food, Jimbo. You’re thinking of the police.

15. Ann Fucking Coulter. Zombie stringmop says what? Something about rape culture? Way to totally misunderstand the meaning of the phrase, Coultergeist. And way to perpetuate the actual thing.

rape-culture-soaking-in-it.jpg

16. Charlie Fucking Daniels. The Devil went down to Georgia; he was looking for a brain to steal. Unfortunately, he’s still looking, because he didn’t find any under this old poop’s ten-gallon brainbucket.

17. Bryan Fucking Fischer. No, Martin Luther King would not be “ecstatic” about Mississippi’s hate-the-queers law, any more than he was about their hate-the-blacks laws. His close friend and colleague in civil rights, Bayard Rustin, was GAY. And MLK knew it, and had no problems with it.

18. Tony Fucking Perkins. PayPal, the “left’s friend”? Hardly. The company founder is one of those libertarian an-cap weirdbeards. They are not even OF the left, much less our friends. And no, trans women are NOT “grown men”, nor will girls be forced to share showers with men. Any man who wants to break into a women’s washroom is not going to bother dressing in drag first, anyway.

who-goes-to-mississippi.jpg

19. Gene Fucking Baker. What century is this, again? Oh yeah, I forgot — who cares. In Mississippi, it’s always 100 years ago!

20. Vincent Fucking Pastore. Please go back to playing mafiosi, and STFU about presidential precandidates and their spouses. Kthxbai.

21. Donald Fucking Drumpf. Gawd, is there any time in this man’s life when he wasn’t slimy and gross? Back when he was married to Frau Drumpf #2, he was already ogling his one-year-old daughter’s legs and speculating on the size of her future boobs, FFS.

drumpf-white-trash.jpg

22. Rick Fucking Scott. You heard what the lady said: He’s an asshole. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

23. Phil Fucking Bryant. Meanwhile, in Mississippi, we have another goober in the gubnor’s mansion. But then again, what does one expect of the State That Time Forgot?

24. Dick Fucking Black. And Virginia? That’s for haters…of literature, among other things. And in his case, of literacy.

dear-mississippi.jpg

25. Aaron Fucking Carter. Washed-up douchebag says what? Please, dude, stop talking. And no, you’re NOT clean and sober. It ain’t what it ain’t.

26. Dennis Fucking Hastert. Oh, being exposed as a child molester was “humiliation enough”? Try walking in the victims’ shoes, they have been living with it for longer, and will continue to do so as long as they live.

27. Ted Fucking Cruz. How do you like your “New York Values” now? Ha, ha.

fu-train.jpg

28. Jospeh Fucking Farah. When you’re a paranoiac, everything looks like terrorism. Including people just trying to lead their normal everyday lives without worrying what some paranoiac thinks of them.

29. Peter Fucking King. Okay, I’m gonna bite my tongue about the cyanide thing, and just propose the only honorable thing you CAN do: No matter who gets the Repug nomination, would you please just STFU about it? Kthxbai.

30. David Fucking Cameron. Surprise, surprise…his old man was one of those offshore tax evaders. And guess what? I’m not buying those lame excuses. Maybe because I expect nothing better of a toff and a pigfucker. Stockbrokers are to Britain what the Mafia is to Sicily. The only real difference between the two is that the latter are at least open about their criminal careers.

arrest-some-this-time.jpg

And finally, to the fucking government of Panama. Yes, all of it. Because a certain Señor Fonseca is still running around loose and flapping his gums on TV talk shows, instead of cooling his heels in the slammer. You wonder how anyone got away with such a vast amount of fraud for so long? Look in the mirror, and you’ll find the fraud’s enablers. Politicians who’d rather laissez-faire when the only fait accompli is looting and highway robbery (to say nothing of spooks and skulduggery), all deserve to be publicly humiliated…right before the mob comes in with the pitchforks and torches to tar and feather them and string them up by their heels, along with all their fine, upstanding cronies in the world of high finance.

Good night, and get fucked!

Share this story:
Posted in Wankers of the Week | Comments Off on Wankers of the Week: Panama Poopers

Pssst. Wanna hide a pile of cash?

panama-papers-tweet

You don’t have to go to Panama to do that. You can do it right in the US of A!

And this is no joke. McClatchy News Service has an ongoing series on the Panama Papers, and one of the things they touch on is how “onshore” the art of Mossack Fonseca’s tax-sheltering is…right in none other than good ol’ down-home Wyoming.

Share this story:
Posted in A Man, A Plan, A Canal, Do As I Say..., Economics for Dummies, Fascism Without Swastikas, Filthy Stinking Rich, Good to Know, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Illegal?, The United States of Amnesia | Comments Off on Pssst. Wanna hide a pile of cash?

Ecuador: Panama Papers also reveal right-wing media bias

correa-press-conf

Gee, what were the odds? It’s not just Venezuela where the “investigative journalists” are only investigating persons with ties to a progressive, socialist government. The same is also happening in Ecuador, and the bias hasn’t escaped the bright green eyes of none other than the president himself:

Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa said on Tuesday that he did not consider that all the names of those from Ecuador involved in the ICIJ’s 11-million-document Panama Papers investigation had come to light.

“We are now going to search through those 10.5 million documents and see all the marvels which will come out,” said Correa during the inauguration of the electric substation project at El Inga, in Pichincha. So far, only three names, of persons tied to the Ecuadorian government, have appeared [in the media]: attorney general Galo Chiriboga; former president of the Central Bank, Pedro Delgado; and attorney Javier Molina, who worked for the National Secretariat of Intelligence (SENAIN).

“But I assure you that in all that data, there are persons involved in Ecuador, which shows us that they haven’t brought them out. They have nothing with which to accuse the government, because we are an honest government,” Correa emphasized, assuring that his government would conduct an investigation of all the data published by the Consortium, in which Ecuadorian journalists from private media are taking part.

“They’ve been searching for a year and haven’t found anything against the government, and they’ve had to invent things and twist the numbers,” said the president.

The Ecuadorian journalists participating in the Panama Papers investigation are: Arturo Torres (El Comercio), Mónica Almeida (El Universo), Xavier Reyes (El Universo), Paúl Mena (El Universo), Andrés Jaramillo (El Comercio) and Alberto Araujo (El Comercio), according to the consortium’s website.

“That’s the much-ballyhooed ‘confidence’, the change of expectations, mortgaging the country so they do us the charity of returning the money to those they looted, which was generated here by the sweat of our workers. With this president, they’ll never get away with that, but Ecuador knows the names of the people who have their capital, their ghost businesses, their trusts in fiscal paradises,” Correa added.

[…]

Earlier, the director of the Ecuadorian Internal Revenue Service (SRI), Leonardo Orlando, assured that his agency will investigate the Ecuadorians whose names are mentioned in the investigation. “For the SRI, the fight against tax havens is nothing new, but a daily struggle in all the processes of control we are confronting.”

Translation mine.

So, there you have it. It’s not just Venezuela where the only names mentioned in the media, so far, are tied to government. And it’s not just Venezuela where the government and its supporters have become immediately suspicious as a result. Ecuador has the exact same problem. Private media are a scourge in both countries; their corporate owners are immensely rich. What are the odds that the same media owners who employ those “investigative journalists”, whom ICIJ has naïvely entrusted with the Panama Papers data, are actually culprits who SHOULD be getting investigated…but are not?

The bright spot in all this is that the public media in Venezuela and Ecuador are not sitting idly by and letting all this pass. They’re actively questioning the private media (and their owners) about all the strangely one-sided coverage they’re providing under the guise of “investigative journalism”. And when they get their hands on the full 11-million-document haul, watch out. There will be a lot more rich (and not so famous) heads rolling. And more right-wing businessmen-turned-politicians will finally be coming under the microscope, too, like Mauricio Macri in Argentina — because those same are all in favor of tax shelters and fiscal paradises. And why would they not be? They have benefited hugely from them, while we little people are suffering the world over.

This is why we, too, have to question the corporate media here in the English-speaking world, along with their conservative political ties. And why we need alternative and public media now, more than ever.

Share this story:
Posted in A Man, A Plan, A Canal, Crapagandarati, Don't Cry For Argentina, Ecuadorable As Can Be, Fascism Without Swastikas, Filthy Stinking Rich, Free Trade, My Ass!, Huguito Chavecito, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land | Comments Off on Ecuador: Panama Papers also reveal right-wing media bias

Why the Panama Papers matter: a victim’s-eye view

War crimes, child sex slavery, the destruction of public services around the world…these are just a few of the horrors enabled by tax evasion, fraud, and offshore shell corporations. Is paying less in taxes really worth this to YOU?

Share this story:
Posted in A Man, A Plan, A Canal, Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Economics for Dummies, Filthy Stinking Rich, Human Rights FAIL, If You REALLY Care, Isn't That Illegal?, Teh Russkies | Comments Off on Why the Panama Papers matter: a victim’s-eye view

Venezuela: Panama Papers leaks show right-wing bias

panama-papers

Hola! And a very buen día to todos ustedes. As leaks from the Panama Papers continue to trickle out in publications around the world, I thought it might be worth mentioning what is, and what is not, being “leaked” concerning Venezuela. Some of you might be surprised at this, but I’m not, because it fits a well-established pattern that will no doubt “inform” (cough) media reports up here in the anglosphere, too, as it always has where Bolivarian Venezuela is concerned. Here’s the story, by AlbaCiudad’s Luigino Bracci, via Aporrea:

The leak of 11 million documents which reveal how wealthy and powerful persons use fiscal paradises to launder money, evade taxes, and hide their wealth, were made known on Sunday by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). The documents come from the Panamanian firm Mossack Fonseca, and some 270,000 (2%) mention Venezuela. Although in the majority of countries, there are politicians, businesspeople, bankers, celebrities, and persons of all political tendencies involved, it’s not like that in Venezuela: they are trying to limit denunciations to Chavistas. And that’s no coincidence: the journalists analyzing the Venezuelan documents work for the websites RunRunes, Armando.info, El Pitazo, and Efecto Cocuyo, all of them of marked opposition tendency and linked to the Instituto Prensa y Sociedad (IPyS), an organization which has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in financing from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), USAID, and the US State Department.

The leaked documents are records of persons who opened offshore companies in fiscal havens with the Panamanian firm Mossack Fonseca. The data were brought to light on Sunday in a joint project of more than 300 investigative journalists from around the world, from 109 media outlets. It’s also been said that this is the largest declassification ever made. Some 2.6 terabytes of data, 1500 times greater than the famous Wikileaks “Cablegate”.

Despite the abundance of documents concerning Venezuela (some 270,000 of them), there have only been four cases of Venezuelans published, all of them supposedly connected to Chavismo: Adrián Velásquez, supposed former chief of President Chávez’s bodyguard, and his wife, Claudia Díaz, said to have been “Chávez’s nurse”; General Víctor Cruz Weffer, a former functionary tried for corruption; and an ex-executive of Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), Jesús Villanueva.

Strangely, in the case of Venezuela, there is no mention of businessmen, right-wing politicians, bankers, sports personalities, or celebrities. The obvious partiality of the reports causes one to suspect that they are only publishing cases linked to a certain political position: Chavismo.

This contrasts with the publications of the Panama Papers in other countries. In Argentina, president Mauricio Macri appears to be involved, along with his father Francisco and brother Mariano. But there is also a person close to the Kirchners, and even the soccer star, Leonel Messi. In Spain, there is Pilar de Borbón, aunt of King Felipe VI, and the Spanish film director, Pedro Almodóvar. In Mexico, there is Juan Armando Hinojosa, known as the “favorite contractor” to Mexican president Enrique Peña Nieto. In Peru, they mention César Almeyda, former chief of Peruvian intelligence and advisor to former president Alejandro Toledo. In Chile, there’s Alfredo Ovalle, ex-president of the Chilean Confederation of Production and Commerce. In Panama, there’s Riccardo Francolini, a very close collaborator with the ex-president of Panama, Ricardo Martinelli. And there are also persons close to Russian president Vladimir Putin, as well as British prime minister David Cameron.

To what do we owe this bias in the Venezuelan case? Probably it’s due to the fact that the journalists involved, all of them, are employees of openly oppositionist digital media, and are in no way objective or impartial, and are also frequently accused of being financed from abroad in order to attack the Venezuelan government. Some of these media are known for their lack of journalistic rigor, for failing to verify the information they publish, and for putting out gossip and rumors, almost always against the government of Nicolás Maduro or his predecessor, Hugo Chávez.

It must be clarified that, at the time of this writing, the Panama Papers documents have not been made public; they cannot be browsed or downloaded by anyone other than the journalists of ICIJ. Privacy reasons, protection of sources, and the immense volume of data and the large number of persons wanting to access the same, would indicate a technical challenge.

According to a note on Efecto Cocuyo, the journalists analyzing the documents are Alfredo Meza, César Batiz, Ewald Scharfenberg, Fabiola Zerpa, Katherine Pennacchio, Laura Weffer, Lisseth Boon, Roberto Deniz and Ronna Rísquez, under the co-ordination of Joseph Poliszuk, editor of Armando.info — a website which describes itself as “investigative journalism”, but whose tendency is markedly anti-leftist.

All these journalists have been members of, or have received training, aid, or recognition from, the Instituto Prensa y Sociedad Venezuela (IPyS-Venezuela), a non-profit organization created in Peru, which lawyer and investigative journalist Eva Golinger has denounced for having received millions of dollars in funding from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the State Department, and USAID in order to work with local media and design messages and propaganda against the Venezuelan government.

“IPyS, created in Peru with USAID and NED money, and later established in Venezuela in 2003, received $49,975 US from the NED in 2009 to ‘promote and defend freedom of expression and press freedom in Venezuela’,” wrote Eva Golinger in 2010. “IPyS also received more than $821,000 in 2008, directly from the State Department, along with the Venezuelan organization Espacio Público, for a two-year project to ‘promote freedom of expression’ in Venezuela, finance journalism programs in Venezuelan universities, and train hundreds of journalists in the use of ‘innovative’ media.”

Golinger describes IPyS as a propaganda agency, financed with US money, as well as being used to attract, recruit and train new journalists favorable to their causes.

In fact, Ewald Scharfenberg, one of the investigators who will publish information from the Panama Papers, is president of the Board of Directors of IPyS Venezuela, and one of their principal spokespersons and trainers. He has also been a correspondent for Reporters Without Borders, another organization financed by the US State Dept.

Alfredo Meza is also a member and editor of Armando.info, along with Joseph Poliszuk, and is a correspondent for the Spanish daily newspaper, El País, according to his Twitter profile. Meza has also given courses and workshops, along with Sharfenberg, under the aegis of IPyS, in various parts of Venezuela and in right-wing local media such as El Nacional.

César Batiz is founder and co-ordinator of the websites El Pitazo and Poderopedia, both rabidly oppositionist. The latter is described as a denouncer of the links and ties of power in Venezuela. Batiz won awards from IPyS in 2014 for several multimedia projects and his coverage. Last September, PSUV parliamentary deputy José Ávila denounced Batiz as having been contracted by the US to write reportage with the purpose of “trying to deceive, pressure and persuade the US government with an opinion template which would allow it to take actions against the government of Venezuela.”

Fabiola Zerpa, Ronna Rísquez, Lisseth Boon and Roberto Deniz are journalists with RunRunes. Zerpa won an IPyS prize in 2013, and Lisseth Boon won several awards and recognitions from the organization in 2015. Joseph Poliszuk and Roberto Deniz also won IPyS prizes in 2014.

Laura Weffer is founder and director of Efecto Cocuyo, an openly oppositionist website.

Without passing judgment on the integrity of these professionals, the fact is that, in a country as markedly polarized as Venezuela, it is impossible to think that this team could generate materials not of anti-Chavista character, surely omitting personages from the business, corporate and political spheres of the Venezuelan right.

It remains to be seen if the data from the Panama Papers will be released in their entirety on the Web, with tools for the public to explore them, in order to get a better idea of the real contents of the 270,000 documents referring to Venezuela.

Translation mine. Links added, also mine.

Interesting, isn’t it, how only right-wing opposition websites were selected to handle the Venezuelan leaks? And how they’ve only published four paltry accounts, to date, out of more than 200,000 of them? What are these yellow journalists trying to hide? Perhaps their own, or perhaps their owners’, involvement?

One thing they can’t hide is their ties to the US State Dept., and that’s mainly because THOSE guys are only throwing them peanuts compared to what’s been squirreled away offshore, in the Bahamas or wherever, with the help of Mossack Fonseca & Co. Also, the State Dept. is actually required to disclose who it throws money at abroad, at least in response to FOIA requests. Eva Golinger has been relentless in her pursuit of those, and you can read all about it here.

Meanwhile, for a wee bit of comic relief amid all this super-serious bullshit, here’s what Alfredo Meza has seen fit to retweet on his yellow, yellow tweeter:

ewald-sharfenberg-tweet

“Regarding the #PanamaPapers of Venezuela, officialism has only been able to say that we’re with the CIA.”

Cute, Ewald, really cute. Except, if you read what I translated above (accurately and in its entirety), you’ll note that the CIA isn’t even mentioned. Only the NED, USAID and the State Dept., and their ties to the “journalists” and their organizations down yonder.

But it would certainly underscore the quality of these “professionals” and their oh-so-unbiased professional work in Venezuela, no?

Share this story:
Posted in A Man, A Plan, A Canal, Chile Sin Queso, Crapagandarati, Don't Cry For Argentina, Fascism Without Swastikas, Good to Know, Huguito Chavecito, Inca Dink-a-Doo, Isn't It Ironic?, The United States of Amnesia, Under the Name of Spain | Comments Off on Venezuela: Panama Papers leaks show right-wing bias

Argentina: Macri implicated in Panama Papers scandal

Well, well. What have we here?

panama-papers-macri

Why yes, that IS the name of the current president of Argentina, along with a couple of family members (father Franco and brother Mariano), on the receipt for a shell corporation in the Bahamas. Nice company name there, buddy! How prescient that you thought of this as far back as 1998! And how clever of you to go through an Uruguayan broker, too! All you had to do was fly a quick hop across the Río de la Plata, and boom! Instant hideaway for Bog only knows how many Argentine pesos. Good job, Mauricio! I’m so impressed!

According to Aporrea, this corporation functioned, with Macri and his father and brother as “directors”, until 2009. But in 2007, Mauricio Macri became governor of the province of Buenos Aires. It wouldn’t have looked good for a man of his standing to be sitting on an offshore account like this, so he concealed his ties to the company by not including it in his sworn statement of interests upon taking office. That’s an even neater bit of fiscal hocus-pocus than setting up a shell corporation in the first place. And it’s a hell of a lot more slick than disappearing one’s political opponents by dropping them drugged from planes over the Río de la Plata, as the Macris’ junta cronies did in the late ’70s and early ’80s.

This news comes at a time when the country’s in a financial crisis, and they’re bashing heads on a daily basis in a frantic effort to pay off their vulture-fund creditors. Bet that if what the Macris and other Argentine corruptos had banked in the Bahamas were actually subject to the same taxation as the earnings of honest Argentines, they’d be able to pay those buzzards off, eh?

Maybe even with interest.

Share this story:
Posted in A Man, A Plan, A Canal, Don't Cry For Argentina, Economics for Dummies, Fascism Without Swastikas, Filthy Stinking Rich, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Illegal?, Paraguay, Uruguay | Comments Off on Argentina: Macri implicated in Panama Papers scandal