“Don’t keep looking for your brother, they threw him from a helicopter”

Pura Soto Rojas points to a headline: “SHOT”. It refers to the deaths, by secret firing squad, of leftist guerrillas during the “democratic” years of the Fourth Republic. Years which were not so democratic in fact, as the tragic story of her brother Víctor Ramón makes clear:

“Víctor Ramón was born in Altagracia de Orituco (state of Guárico). He was 32 years old when they disappeared him. When they re-opened the Central University of Venezuela (UCV), after closing it during the dictatorship of [Marcos] Pérez Jiménez, he studied sociology. He spent a long time there because he was persecuted as a director of the FCU and of the Revolutionary Left Movement (MIR). Because he was constantly in hiding, he did not finish the semester so that he could graduate in 1963.”

So begins the story told by Pura Soto Rojas, sister of Víctor Ramón Soto Rojas, whose name appears on a list of at least 1,000 persons who disappeared during the era of the “Fourth Republic” (1958-1998), a period which will be the object of a special investigation to punish the crimes of the state in the name of a crusade against the left, as soon as the “Law Against Forgetting” is passed.

It is said that Víctor Ramón — brother of the current president of the Venezuelan National Assembly, Fernando Soto Rojas — disappeared on July 27, 1964, because that was the day on which military forces of the government of Raúl Leoni detained him, due to his militancy in the MIR.

* * *

How do you remember the day on which he disappeared?

In June of ’64, Ramón went to give a political-education workshop to the guerrillas of the Ezequiel Zamora Front, on the mountain El Bachiller (on the border of the states of Miranda, Guárico and Anzoátegui). Weeks later, there was a bombing, and while fleeing, he came out on the road along with Trino Barrios, and that’s when they arrested him.

They informed my sister that they had taken him to San Juan de los Morros (Guárico), to the National Guard post commanded by Genarino Peña Peña. They told her that they gave my brother a mock shooting and then transferred him to the National Guard in El Paraíso, Caracas.

When we arrived in El Paraíso, we met with a friend, a lieutenant who told me: “He was here, but the Digepol (General Directorate of Police) took him because he was a prisoner of theirs. Go away quickly, move, Pura, move!” he told us.

Was it a bad sign that he was taken by the Digepol?

Yes! Everyone knew about the tortures in the Digepol centre at Las Brisas (Caracas). There they told us that yes, he was detained, but they were interrogating him. That was on a Thursday. They told us: “Come back on Sunday, he’s already got visitors.” We did, but he was already gone. A friend from COPEI who was there told us: “Hurry because they took him out yesterday, very tortured, to Cúpira (Miranda).” I started to yell “Murderers! They killed my brother! Murderers!” I remember that the lawyer who was with us told my mother: “Rosa, you’d better not bring Pura along anymore, because they’ll rape her on you.”

That’s when my mother’s torment began. We went to Cúpira on Monday, to the Operations Centre. “We don’t have any detainees here,” they told us, but Mama always thought he was there because all the soldiers looked at her face when she said she had come looking for Ramón. They told us he was in Barcelona (Anzoátegui). We went, and found nothing. Later, they told us Maracaibo (Zulia) — not there, either. In El Dorado, lies. Wherever they said, my mama went.

It was a case that made big noise in the press. Mama went everywhere, even to the International Red Cross, and no one came, not the OAS, not the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, no one. My mother was only looking for her son, right up to the end. She died at 102 years of age. She said: “Damn it, I’m going to go, and I won’t have anywhere to bring a rose to my son.” Every September 26, on Ramón’s birthday, she would say: “Today he’s this many years old.”

How did you find out about the helicopter?

I was studying psychology at the UCV. One day, a soldier came to the FCU looking for me. We were sitting on a bench, and he told me: “Look, don’t go on searching for your brother, they took him to the encampment of San José de Guaribe (Guárico), they tortured him a lot. I put a pair of Bermuda shorts on him, and they took him up in a helicopter with Lt. Tomás Rojas Grafe. When the helicopter came back, the detainee was not on board.” The pilot said, “You can’t do that, how can you throw a live person from a helicopter?” and Rojas Grafe replied: “Shut up, or the same thing will happen to you.”

Years later, I saw in the news the case of the “monster of Mamera” (1980), the crime of the Metropolitan Police officer Ledezma, and it looked to me like the face of the same soldier. They told me that when he was a prisoner, he said he knew of the Soto Rojas case, where a man was thrown from a helicopter.

And did anyone ever confirm that?

There was a soldier, Herber Faull, who said that they ordered him to look into the helicopter story, and he said that the body of my brother had smashed into a very large ceiba tree near Guatopo (Guárico). That they lowered and lifted him from the helicopter to force him to talk, and at one point they hit him against the tree. That’s the latest version we’ve heard, about six years ago. We never told Mama. Why?

That was what happened, remember that they used that method a lot in Vietnam, that’s where they also implemented it. It was an era of state terrorism, the government was aware of all this barbarity. It was horrible. There were raids all the time, in the night, they destroyed everything, and it wasn’t a dictatorship, no, it was a democracy!

We lived with our guarantees [of freedom] suspended all the time, with curfews, with Rómulo Betancourt [as president] it happened all the time.

Whom did they raid? Guerrillas’ families?

No! It was everyone on the left, you couldn’t be a leftist, it was prohibited. Either you were an Adeco or a Copeyano, and if they didn’t disappear you, there were still thousands executed by firing squad and disappeared. So many campesinos died in bombing raids, accused of aiding the guerrillas.

Look, the mother of Gabriel Puerta Aponte, the leader of the Red Flag faction, lived in the building next door. They raided her home all the time. She’s dead now. I always asked myself how she would feel seeing her son today, allied to their own executioners.*

How did you resign yourselves? How did you stop searching for Ramón?

We lost and regained hope over a long period of time. We went into mourning and came out of it again. The minister of defence, Florencio Gómez, said one day that they had taken him to do reconnaissance in a guerrilla zone, and that when he tried to flee they invoked the anti-vagrancy law. So my mama said: “Aha, if that’s the case, then give me his body, already!” And the response was, “I don’t know if we can, because it’s in a mountainous area and we don’t know where it is.”

One day, years later, Mama told us she’d had a vision in a church, that she had lifted a military canvas covering and seen him. Then she said, “My son is dead.”

And you?

I think I was the last to resign myself. I always throught: Isn’t that Ramón over there? Wandering around, crazy from all the torture. When I went to Guárico I saw a lot of madmen, and I thought of him. All I know for certain is that we never had a funeral, a grave, nothing. He remains disappeared.

What did your mother think of the political causes of her sons?

Did you know she was in Acción Democrática (AD)? Just like Fernando when he took up politics. But not Ramón, he was in the Communist Party and later he went into the MIR. AD was of the [centre-]left. Mama scolded them when they went with the MIR, and I recall Ramón telling her: “Mama, something very big is going to happen to you when you leave AD.” And Mama said later, when they disappeared him: “Look what my son said. He was right, something big did happen to me.”

Do you believe she passed her ideals along in any way?

I think so. She had revolutionary ideas, she greatly admired Arévalo Cedeño, who was under house arrest during the Gómez dictatorship. She liked his ideas of welfare for the people, even though she never talked of Socialism, she had no idea what it was. She had only a fourth-grade education, but she taught us to share. If anyone came to our house, she would offer food and shelter, and that too is Socialism.

* * *

Pura Soto Rojas is a member of the Front of Friends and Families of the Victims of Crimes of State of the Fourth Republic. This organization promotes the creation of a special law to punish the political murders, executions and disappearances of that period, 1958-1998.

The Truth and Justice Commission will be created as a result of this law, which is to be presented during the next session of the National Assembly, and with it, hundreds of documents from the military and governmental archives will begin to be declassified.

Translation mine.

It has taken a long time for the families of the Venezuelan disappeared to gain recognition for their plight, never mind legal redress. During the Fourth Republic, that vaunted time of freedom and democracy that supposedly disappeared after Hugo Chávez was elected in late 1998, censorship of the news was commonplace, particularly under the governments of Raúl Leoni and Rómulo Betancourt (both of the AD, the party supposedly of the centre-left, which in fact governed Venezuela like a fascist dictatorship). As it was during the 1960s that they reigned, they were early adopters of the same hauntingly awful strategies and tactics later used by the Argentine Junta, as well as Augusto Pinochet in Chile. The same universities that had been shut down under the dictator, Marcos Pérez Jiménez, were also shut down during the “democratic” era of Leoni and Betancourt. The same raids that the political police staged under the dictator, were staged by those same police under the “democrats”. As Yves Montand’s character, a US police chief who trained military and police torturers in Uruguay, says in the movie State of Siege, “Governments come and go, but the police stay.”

And the Digepol, later renamed the DISIP, definitely stayed. Under whatever name, it was very much the repressive organ of a fascist police state. Heads of government changed, but the essential practices of repression did not…until 1998, that is, when they were finally abolished altogether by that evil, repressive, antidemocratic Castro-communist, Chávez. You know, the same one who refuses to censor the press, so that the opposition media can comically crucify itself on a daily basis, screeching that there is no freedom of the press in Venezuela?

How soon they forget. Even under the oh-so-democratic rule of Carlos Andrés Pérez, author of the Caracazo (may he rot in hell), the Venezuelan press was heavily censored. If the publishers did not self-censor, entire news items were left blank by order of the government. Journalists who did not comply faced prison and torture. Some of them, particularly those of the left, were also disappeared. Their stories, too, will likely come out when this bill now before the National Assembly becomes law.

But don’t look for anyone in the opposition media to celebrate that coming triumph of the freedom of information. They’ll probably be too busy reporting on their “political prisoners”, who in fact are politician prisoners, in jail for corruption. And screaming persecution, as always, ad nauseam.

As if THEY knew what political persecution was.

*Bandera Roja, or “Red Flag”, formerly of the left, is now allied in effect with the right-wing anti-Chávez opposition. This passage alludes to their betrayal of everything they used to stand for. The current opposition is the direct descendant of the AD and COPEI of Fourth Republic days — in other words, the same old political ruling class responsible for all the political murders, repressions and disappearances from 1958 to 1998.

Share this story:
Posted in Artsy-Fartsy Culture Stuff, Chile Sin Queso, Cops Behaving Badly, Crapagandarati, Don't Cry For Argentina, Fascism Without Swastikas, Huguito Chavecito, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land, Paraguay, Uruguay, The United States of Amnesia | 1 Comment

Music for a Sunday: Might be a brave new world…

…but it’s really not my home:

For me, this is the song that started a lot: my love for the music (and social justice activism) of Tom Cochrane, and oh yeah: my interest in Neruda, for whom the album that this song came from was named. A stark, gorgeous gem from the early 1980s.

Share this story:
Posted in Artsy-Fartsy Culture Stuff, Canadian Counterpunch, Music for a Sunday | Comments Off on Music for a Sunday: Might be a brave new world…

Wankers of the Week: Weiners, wieners and just plain dicks

weiner-wiener-confesses.jpg

Crappy weekend, everyone! So, how are you liking Schlongergate? Yeah, me neither. But at least it spawned some funny toons, which I’ve put to good use here. Not everyone on this list has something to do with the flaccid scandal of the week, but all of these wankers are wieners or dicks in one way or another:

1. Andrew Fucking Breitbart. Yeah, yeah, you broke the story of Andrew Weiner sending pictures of his (scantily clad) penis to consenting adult women. Bravo. So, where are the underage girls you and your fucktard brigade insisted he was sexually harassing? And why do I suddenly hear crickets? Oh, I know: It’s because you’re not a real journalist, you didn’t report a real story, and you didn’t bring down the man you were hoping to force into quitting. Bra-fucking-vo!!! You’ve had your allotted fifteen minutes, literally, by now. Now fuck off and go drink yourself out of existence for good, eh?

2. Alexis Fucking Bellino. Srsly, who the fuck cares what some trashy-ass plastic professional housewife “thinks” about feminism? Hey Alexis, you and your “traditional” marriage are not worth watching or talking about. THERE IS NOTHING INTERESTING ABOUT YOU. People like you are the reason my TV gets turned off for everything but the news these days. Now shut the fuck up and get the hell off the air.

3. Sarah Fucking Palin. Doubling down on the dumb with Paul Revere? SO not presidential. Her fans fucking with Revere’s Wikipedia entry in a vain attempt to back her up? SO not smart. Learn some real history, all of you, and GO AWAY. PS: “Beef, tequila and condoms” is apparently the new “lawyers, guns and money”. And if you’re wondering where that fecal odor is coming from, it’s something about to hit the fan.

4. Greg Fucking Fultz. Harassing his ex-girlfriend via an anti-choice billboard for miscarrying? And a Twitter feed full of hideous death threats, unfunny “jokes”, and violent “thoughts”? That’s about as dickish as it gets. And now we know why she (and his initial endorsers in the anti-choice movement) dumped him. What gives any man the right to tell a woman what to do with her own body?

antichoice-billboard-fail.jpg

Especially if he wears a fucking mullet, for fuck’s sake. If you can afford to put up a noisome billboard (pure roadside view pollution!) to vent your spleen on someone who doesn’t want to see you anymore, you could at least spring a few bucks, visit a decent barber, and make your sorry self presentable.

PS: That “N.A.N.I.” at the bottom? Not an organization. It’s the ex’s first name, spelled out. Oh, and she’s also disabled. Nice of him to pick on someone so ill equipped to physically fight back, eh? (Changing the org’s name to “C.A.N.I.”? That’s got W-E-A-S-E-L written all over it! Tacit admission, then, that he did this to further abuse his battered ex, not to fight for anyone’s so-called “right to life”.)

PPS: Gee, Greg, while you’re at it, how about shelling out some of that hefty billboard buckage on the kids you already have…IN INDIANA? Or do they not matter because they’re already born?

PPPS: A serial harasser of very young girls? And a wife-beater? Wow, I’d never have guessed. But that’s not all! Ladies, he’s available! Don’t you want to sign on to be his next victim? He’s a wingnut, he’s violent, he’s off his meds, he’s utterly unattractive — what more could you ask for?

weiner-cant-say.jpg

5. Scott Fucking Hagerstrom. How the fuck are scare tactics involving fake eviction notices supposed to advance prosperity? Answer: They don’t. They just manipulate people’s fear of being thrown out of their homes for no apparent reason. This has been another jackass stunt brought to you by Americans For Prosperity, the stupidest fucking bunch of Koch-suckers ever.

6. David Fucking Tkachuk. Pardon me, O Unelected Squatter in the Upper Chamber, but I fail to see how carrying a sign reading STOP HARPER is in any way a violation of an oath to the Queen. If you’re going to quote the words of an oath, it might behoove you not to read stupid shit into it. Nowhere does it say “I shall not peacefully and silently protest while on duty.” It doesn’t even explicitly state that a Senate page shall be impartial; it only pledges loyalty to the Queen and her heirs and successors. Period. It is not an oath to tacitly legitimize what the entire country knows is a false government, in contempt of Parliament (and, one would imagine, unworthy of the Queen and her heirs and successors, such as they are). And those pro-war comments are downright obscene, since what our troops are doing over there is propping up a government even less legitimate than this one. I don’t know what kind of oath our unelected senators swear to the people they allegedly serve, but these remarks are a gross disservice to us all. So spare us all the pomposity and non-circumstance, and just sit down and shut the fuck up.

dsk-bailout-rejected.jpg

7. Conrad Fucking Black, again. Yes, Lord Blah-Blah of Cross-who-cares is ba-ack on the weekly wankapedia. Treating his fellow prison inmates as servants and demanding special treatment from the wardens doesn’t surprise me; I expected as much from him. I doubt he even wipes his own bum. But what really made me sit up and stare was Tal Bachman’s 2007 account of a very, very strange visit to Lord Blah-Blah’s mansion, in which a rather large portrait of Adolf Hitler was displayed quite prominently on a wall. It just seems so…EMBLEMATIC of something, somehow. Even more strangely, no word about it from an eerily silent Lady Blah-Blah, who is otherwise so voluble in her victimhood as a Jew. So, I guess that’s all just for show then, Babs?

8. Danny Fucking Williams. He hates les français? Zut alors! Well, there’s a shocker. Would never have guessed that of HIM! If ever you wonder why so much Canadian comedy is dedicated to mocking this self-important little putz, now you know. Danny is the living embodiment of a bad Newfie joke. (And if you wonder why so many Québécois are constantly yattering on about separating from the rest of Canada, now you also know.)

9. Rush Fucking Limbaugh. Oho, the Pigman can dish dirt out, but he can’t take it? Shocker of the century. As is the fact that his sex-junket (in an underage-prostitution capital, no less) and illicit procurement of Viagra is not a hateful rumor, but a true fact, reported by none other than CBS.

weiner-transparency.jpg

10. James Fucking Taranto. I fail to see exactly what feminists had to do with Weinergate. So does he, so he just wings it (I almost wrote “wangs it”, which would have been an appropriate Freudian slip!) and basically just cooks up a big, weird, irrelevant mishmash over a long-reviled sexist statue that Weiner proposed selling on Craig’s List. Never mind that the statue in question has been deemed an eyesore since the days of Fiorello LaGuardia, it’s all the feminists’ fault! I guess this sort of shit flies if you write for the Wall Street Urinal; no editorial is too stupid for the people who gave us the atrocious Mary Anastasia O’Fucking Grady, it seems.

11. Darrell Fucking Issa. Pay no attention to that fat little man behind the Weinergate curtain, folks…he’s just deflecting your attention, yet again, from all the fuckery crapitalism is inflicting on you. Which is why they’re gonna go sniffing the crotches and panties of everyone, and cooking up bogus accusations of him chasing underage girls (when, as is now known, the recipients of Weiner’s dumb-ass crotch shots have all in fact been adults.)

12. Glenn Fucking Beck. Just when I was getting perfectly comfortable with not hearing him masturbating over the public airwaves anymore, what does he do? Exploit fascism and the Holocaust. Which, when you think about it, is exactly the sort of shit he WOULD do. Shut the fuck up and go the hell away, you creepy, doughy troll!

beck-brownshirt.jpg

13. Tony Fucking Clement. Surprise, surprise…he spent G8 security money in his own riding, WHICH HAD ABSOLUTELY NO NEED OF WHAT THE MONEY WAS ACTUALLY SPENT UPON. If you’re wondering what that awful, rancid smell is, it’s pickled pork…fresh from the SupposiTory barrel.

14. Tracy Fucking Morgan. Horrible, homophobic death threats against your own son are “a joke”? So funny, everyone forgot to laugh. I hope the Children’s Aid Society has a sense of humor, because if they don’t, dude’s in a buttload of trouble. Pun intended.

15. John Fucking Ensign. Who’s got a sex scandal waaaayyyyy worse than Weinergate? He does. He spent $96,000 in hush money to his mistress (even calling it “severance pay”!). Even worse, it was in the form of campaign contributions. And worse still, he committed perjury over it. And that’s not all. Did you know he’s a sex predator, too? He first hit on Cynthia Hampton while she and her husband were staying at his house after theirs had been broken into by burglars. Some family values, eh? Yeah, nothing like a nice bit of capitalizing on misfortune between friends: “Sure, you can stay in my house if I can stick it in your wife!”

16. Sarah Fucking Burge. Honestly, isn’t the world already saturated with phony boobs and scary faces? I suspect this woman has body dysmorphic disorder, but I’d hate to see it become hereditary. Botox Mom was bad enough.

dsk-busted.jpg

17. Newt Fucking Gingrich. Can you believe he’s still mulling a presidential run after all the evidence is in of his total moral unfitness? Somebody, please, whack Newty upside the head with a clue-by-four…hmmm, on second thought, don’t. The entertainment value of seeing this ultra-hypocritical oozeball losing to a black guy is gonna be sheer comedy gold.

18. Iurii Fucking Chumak. Yeah, sure, low blood sugar caused him to grope a flight attendant. That is, if “low blood sugar” is another way of saying “drunkenness and lechery”. Here’s a tip for all you other hypoglycemics out there: Do NOT self-medicate with straight Scotch. Especially not on a plane and in the presence of women.

19. Bryan Fucking Fischer. No, of COURSE gays didn’t cause the Holocaust. Silly fools, didn’t you know they caused the Nazi Party? Well, now you know. Lyin’ Bryan has set you, er, STRAIGHT.

20. Rick Fucking Santorum. Oh, wooky…someone is miffed that his name is synonymous with the goopy mess that oozes out of an anus after a vigorous bout of buggering. Too bad, Icky Ricky…I can think of many things worse. Like, say, having your name also be synonymous with creepy fetus fetishism or man-on-dog sex. Oh, wait…it already is all of that, too!

weiner-weenie.jpg

21. Nathaniel Fucking Heard. Doesn’t everyone leave a severed deer’s head at his ex-wife’s home for their daughter to play with? What? They DON’T? What kind of sick puppies ARE they, anyway? And why won’t they let him have contact with the kid? The ANIMALS!!!

22. Ozzie Fucking Guillen. Say, didn’t he tweet off on Sean Penn before, and in the same basic stupid words? I seem to recall that he did. The sad part is, I also distinctly recall that Ozzie used to be a Chavista. And he went off on Sean for…drumroll please…BEING A CHAVISTA. Gee, Ozzie, did all the Yanqui dinero turn your head? Too bad for you. Because one day, it’s gonna run out. And when it does, I predict Venezuela will start looking good to you again…Chavecito and all.

23. The Fucking PMO. Oh, how big of them to saddle Canadians with only 95% of Stephen Fucking Harper’s airfare to a Stanley Cup final (which he jinxed with his presence; the Canucks lost atrociously, 4-0, to the Bruins.) Compared to the 100% he usually forces us to pay, that’s awfully generous, wouldn’t you say? And he grossly underestimated the commercial airfare for one person, too — by more than five-sixths of what it would really cost. Oh, what a historic moment it is, indeed. I’m just surprised he didn’t prorogue Parliament again for this. Hey Harpo, here’s some free advice for you: DON’T ATTEND THE LAST GAME.

stop-harper-hockey-fan.jpg

(Yes, this is Photoshop. But if he shows up at the last game in the series, he could well be seeing a real one right in front of him. This meme is catching on, folkies.)

24. Donald Fucking Trump. Ooooooo, hand-scrawled hate mail! How very mature. Still planning on running as a third-party candidate, Combover Boy? Please do…it would be so nice to see some right-wing vote-splitting. It would also be nice to see you and whomever the Repugs pick as their sitting duck lose by vast double-digit margins. In the meantime, your pissing contest is very entertaining, in ways you never foresaw.

25. Martha Fucking Raddatz. Oh, face it, Martha — the war in Afghanistan is gonna be lost no matter who bombs whom, or what, how many times. Smart bombs, dumb war — and dumber war correspondents are they who feel they simply MUST cheerlead for it all.

dsk-grandeur.jpg

And finally, the entire fucking SupposiTory party. Triumphalism is one thing, but mocking pro-democracy protests that have your number? Beyond fucking chutzpah. Your last term in office is gonna feel like anything BUT a majority, if REAL Canadians (like Brigette, and me, and over 20 million others) have anything to say about it. Because, in fact, that’s what it is. Remember, the majority did NOT vote for you and do not like what you stand for, and are going to bust their asses to stop you in earnest. And all the Canucks games, piano-manglings, sweater-vests and kitten-naming contests (!!!) in the world are NEVER gonna change that.

Good night, and get fucked!

Share this story:
Posted in Wankers of the Week | 4 Comments

Collateral Suicide

What do I have against the “humanitarian intervention” of NATO in Libya? Lots of things. This video contains a clue as to some of them:

So, let’s recap: So far, no Gaddafi. Their main target (as declared by NATO) remains strangely elusive, considering all the “smart” weaponry they’ve supposedly deployed against him. All this for just one man? They’ve tried to bomb him before, 25 years ago in fact, and succeeded only in killing one of his daughters. Is this “humanitarian”? Funny, but another of Gaddafi’s daughters doesn’t think so…and she’s laying war-crimes charges.

But I guess this latest round of slaughter will also be casually written off as more “collateral damage”, that hateful and meaningless phrase. Isn’t it funny how the same allies who succeeded (supposedly) in capturing and killing Osama bin Laden without a bombing raid are instead falling into the same old Bush-league quagmire in Libya as in Afghanistan and Iraq? Gee, don’t you wonder why that is?

Also, note what the father of the girl who tried to kill herself says. NATO is not needed, in Libya or anywhere. He is absolutely correct. NATO is a Cold War relic that should have been scrapped, along with ALL the existing nuclear weapons everywhere on Earth, the day the Berlin Wall was torn down by the German people. Yet here it is, more than two decades later, still clanking around like a “walker” from Star Wars, unable to achieve its stated objectives of removing one rogue leader (and its covert one of installing a tame dictator in his place. What, you think they support the Arab Spring, in its Libyan incarnation? Naïve child. If they seriously did, would they be bombing the country to hell and driving frightened girls to suicide attempts? And do you think they’d have sat around twiddling their thumbs and wringing their hands over Egypt, Tunisia, etc.?)

I predict they will not deliver a penny in the support they promised the rebels, either. That billion dollars US is just Monopoly money until the cheque clears the bank. (Actually, of the two, I’d prefer Monopoly money; at least it has tangible substance and will buy you little plastic houses you can plant from Baltic Avenue to the Boardwalk.)

In short, this “humanitarian intervention” is a load of khara.

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Barreling Right Along, BushCo Death Watch, If You REALLY Care, Isn't That Illegal?, Newspeak is Nospeak, Rivers in Egypt, The United States of Amnesia, The War on Terra | 2 Comments

Festive Left Friday Blogging Too: Brigette has NOT left Ottawa yet!

Here she is, speaking at today’s “Stop Harper” rally:

Photo courtesy Dylan Penner, via Twitter.

Share this story:
Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Festive Left Friday Blogging | 2 Comments

Festive Left Friday Blogging: Ollanta Presidente!

My gosh, the dominoes are just tumbling in Latin America, aren’t they? It’s getting so that you’d hardly recognize the place anymore. First it was Venezuela, then Bolivia and Ecuador. Argentina and (for a while) Chile have had some progressive types, too. Brazil is now on its second one. And Paraguay got a “red” ex-bishop, and Uruguay an old Tupamaro. Honduras had a liberal guy who took his cues from the more progressive neighbors to the south, and he scared the shit out of Washington so badly, they had to back a coup to depose him before he rewrote the Honduran constitution on true democratic lines. And now, after a bloated, disastrous term of “investment grade” Twobreakfasts García, look who’s finally in power in Peru:

Yep, he made it. He increased his vote respectably following his loss last time around, and beat out the daughter of a dictator on the second round of balloting this time ’round. That it even went to a second round between those two, of all people, was something surprising for me; I’d have thought Peruvians were so tired of neoliberal neofascism that they’d be electing him in one. Especially since the booming success of Venezuela under Chavecito, who hasn’t been a bit shy about his moral support where Ollanta is concerned. WTF, Peru?

Of course, all the usual voices of unreason have started cranking up already, with the usual belchings of fact-free prose. The CS Monitor, in particular, haz Teh Stoopid in a major way. How the election of a leftist could possibly mark a decline in the Latin American left, I don’t know. Guess they had to spin this in favor of neoliberal bullshit somehow, or the corporatists behind them would scream. Everyone who’s been following Otto (who is not an Ollanta fan himself) even halfway attentively, knows that “investment grade” Peru’s so-called economic growth is a big lie for the most part. My advice is to take whatever Sara Miller Llana says and rotate it 180 degrees if you want to get anywhere near the truth, and then dump a huge truckload of salt on it.

Or better still, read Upside Down World. They’ve also got good analysis from Mark Weisbrot, who notes that in fact, the big losers here were the traditional ruling caste of Peru. Stick THAT in your crack-pipe and smoke it, Sara!

And The Nation is another solid go-to place. They actually report on LatAm leftists without prejudice, and their piece on Ollanta’s win and what it means is must-read analysis. (It’s also very damning of the imperialist interference revealed by Wikileaks. Read it, read it, READ IT!)

Meanwhile, here are my own thoughts:

Plenty of Peruvians, especially in the working classes, are surely hoping Ollanta will, indeed, be the “Peruvian Chávez”. They’re also looking at the changes in neighboring Bolivia and hoping that some of Evo’s hard-won good luck rubs off. They’ve been waiting an awfully long time; at least five years, probably much more. Of course, how much Ollanta will succeed in copying Chavecito’s and Evo’s success depends on how much of the Peruvian parliament he can get behind him. I don’t know what’s up with that.

It would be nice if Ollanta’s Peru could be the next ALBA signatory; it would be especially hopeful for the indigenous peoples, who’ve seen all kinds of terrible (and bloody) setbacks under the overtly racist rule of Alan García, who had no qualms about selling their land right out from under them and even called them “dogs” for daring to protest against that. (None of them are sorry to see HIM go.) But I don’t know whether or when that will happen; again, a lot hinges on the parliament, and it appears to be a house much divided against itself.

Let’s face it, in a country as counterintuitive as Peru is, any victory over imperialism is worth celebrating, however small. I don’t know if Ollanta will exceed expectations or even meet them. But at least he’s not going in there totally friendless and alone; he’ll have support from Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador, at the very least. And in any case, he can do no worse than has already been done. He beat out the worst, so it’s worth hoping for the best. I dare to hope he will change Peru for the better, and I look forward to seeing how he does that.

¡Viva Ollanta PRESIDENTE!

Share this story:
Posted in All About Evo, Brazil is the Bomb!, Chile Sin Queso, Don't Cry For Argentina, Economics for Dummies, Ecuadorable As Can Be, Festive Left Friday Blogging, Huguito Chavecito, Inca Dink-a-Doo, No Good Deed Goes Unpunished, Paraguay, Uruguay, Socialism is Good for Capitalism! | Comments Off on Festive Left Friday Blogging: Ollanta Presidente!

So, “Arab Spring” was the wrong thing for Brigette to say?

Funny, but actual Egyptians don’t think so:

The Arab Spring, they say, isn’t about ballot boxes, it’s about the dignity of humanity. Something the Harper Government™ doesn’t respect, and probably never did.

While we’re at it, let’s compare and contrast some other right and wrong ways to look at what Brigette did. First, the wrong way (from an article that starts all right):

I don’t approve of how she made her point. Her gesture was disrespectful. You don’t accept an invitation to someone’s house and spit in the soup.

The commenters at Common Dreams take issue with this paragraph, for obvious reasons. It’s as stupid an expression of prissy disapproval as such an otherwise intelligent piece can hold. Brigette DePape wasn’t “invited to someone’s house”, because the Houses of Parliament belong to ALL Canadians (or should; the Harper Government™ has apparently turned them over to big corporations.) She was a public servant doing her thankless job on behalf of us all. And what she did wasn’t “spitting”, and there wasn’t any “soup”; the time-honored ritual and the hallowed halls were already sullied by Harper & Co. Brigette, in her own small way, was just trying to clean up the Augean Stable.

Now, here’s how you get it right, O ye hacks of the Professional Commentariat. Take note:

Brigette DePape is a young woman who passionately believes we can create a world that is more just and equitable. She is smart, hard-working, energetic and community minded. She is respectful yet not afraid to think critically and express her views.

She’s done all the right things in her young life and the zest in which she lives it would make any parent proud. Her award of a Loran Scholarship, an honour awarded to students who have shown excellence in academia and community service, is evidence of her competence. In a world where success is measured in terms of personal wealth and individual pursuits, Brigette and other youth like her should be commended for looking beyond their individual careers as they fight for a better world.

Brigette was fortunate to have found herself in an unusual position – privileged yet powerless. On the one hand, she was honoured to have been selected as a Senate page, a position difficult to attain and one coveted by students dreaming of political careers. But for someone with Brigette’s integrity and passion for justice, the excitement of being a page soon wore thin. At some point she realized that it presented a creative way for her to turn a completely powerless position into an opportunity to express her political views with the hope of raising awareness and mobilizing toward change.

In an age when newspapers have the power to influence voters by endorsing politicians who put business interests before public interest; in a society where a political party is given a majority government in spite of demonstrating its disregard and disrespect for the parliamentary process; and in a society where the acquisition of a hockey team gets more media attention in one day than many issues of significant public relevance get in a decade, Brigette selflessly and brilliantly played the card that she had available to her, in spite of the unknown consequences to her as an individual.

Are you paying attention, people? This is how it’s done. And, oh yeah, it’s done right for a good reason:

Perhaps it is because I know Brigette and have a high regard and respect for her sincere desire for social, economic and environmental justice that I have been so deeply moved by her courageous act. Perhaps this is why the image of her standing in the Senate is the most powerful image of political protest in Canada in my recent memory.

Notwithstanding, I believe that those who think that Brigette’s action will be a blip in history, written off as some silly act of youthful defiance, are wrong. We have seen throughout history the power that single acts of non-violent civil disobedience can produce.

Yes, it helps that the author of this piece knows Brigette personally and can vouch for her integrity. But more than that, she’s also right about single acts of non-violent protest. The same hacks who are currently pooh-poohing Brigette’s “disrespect for decorum and tradition” would probably have dismissed Rosa Parks as just some crazy old black bitch with bad manners, or sneered at Gandhi’s loincloth and called it a savage’s diaper, or, like the late, unlamented and utterly repugnant Madame Nhu, simply have applauded over all those Buddhist monks setting themselves afire to protest the imperialist occupation and war in Vietnam.

Those hacks really ought to think twice before firing off another pompous defence of the status quo, and ask themselves just what lies behind that mask of decorum. And most of all, they should ask themselves why Brigette chose to tear it off just for one brief moment, and come up with an answer that isn’t pat or dismissive (“oh, she’s young, they’re all naïve at that age”). Failing to do so is a sure way to get history to piss all over your grave.

PS: Here’s Brigette, explaining why she did it:

Our views are not represented by our political system. How else could we have a government that 60 per cent of the people voted against? A broken system is what has left us with a Conservative government ready to spend billions on fighter jets we don’t need, to pollute the environment we want protected, to degrade a health-care system we want improved, and to cut social programs and public sector jobs we value. As a page, I witnessed one irresponsible bill after another pass through the Senate, and wanted to scream “Stop.”

Such a system leads us to feel isolated, powerless and hopeless — thousands of Canadians made that clear in their responses to my action. We need a reminder that there are alternatives. We need a reminder that we have both the capacity to create change, and an obligation to. If my action has been that reminder, it was a success.

Media and politicians have argued that I tarnished the throne speech, a solemn Canadian tradition. I now believe more in another tradition — the tradition of ordinary people in this country fighting to create a more just and sustainable world, using peaceful direct action and civil disobedience.

Now THERE is a tradition I can get behind 100%. We all should!

Share this story:
Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Crapagandarati, If You REALLY Care, Rivers in Egypt, The Bold and the Badass, Uppity Wimmin | Comments Off on So, “Arab Spring” was the wrong thing for Brigette to say?

Ah, memories!

This video, from 1990, shows Rush Limbaugh filling in for Pat Sajak on the latter’s short-lived (if you blinked, you missed it) TV talk show…and getting clobbered, metaphorically speaking, by an anything-but-captive audience:

In the first segment, the Pigman tries to tackle the subject of abortion. He uses a Ms. Potato Head doll to represent then-NOW leader, Molly Yard, in a bit of insult-slinging that I suppose was meant to be funny. It’s plain that he expects his audience to be a bunch of dittoheads, nodding along with his premise, which is “Oh, what a shame that those baby-killing feminists would put decent, God-fearing Idaho farmers out of work by threatening to boycott their potatoes unless the governor vetoed that anti-abortion bill!”

And that’s exactly what doesn’t happen.

When the Pigman announces that the poor beleaguered governor of Idaho has indeed vetoed the draconian legislation under intense pressure, people get up and cheer like mad. And the first one on her feet is a black woman who gives Rusty a tremendous (and heavily applauded) chewing-out for his anti-choice crapagandizing on the radio. Oh, she knows exactly who he is, and she’s not a whit impressed! She points out that rhetoric like his is costing women their lives all over the world, wherever abortion is still illegal. And the audience clearly loves her for saying it.

The next segment is even more fun. Rusty, not yet chastened, tries to take on Affirmative Action. His premise that it’s Affirmative Action that’s racist (and not the white sheet-wearers who oppose it), goes over like a lead balloon. Coming on the heels of his encounter with the Badass Black Lady and her strong pro-choice support from the crowd, you’d think he’d realize that this was the worst possible topic to bring up.

But not our Pigman! He was tone-deaf long before his addiction to OxyContin forced him to get those cochlear implants, apparently. And he comes off like a whiny playground bully who screams when those he provoked give him a righteous ass-whipping. Just listen to his voice go up, and up, and up…

Stick around till the end, and you’ll see the funniest part of all: Rush Limbaugh explaining why the audience is no longer there. They’ve all been “asked” to leave because they wouldn’t stop challenging his nonsense! But nobody’s been evicted, oh noooo. And of course the Pigman is so into civil debate, yes he is…which is why his radio show nowadays is so heavily guarded by call screeners that if you want to challenge him, you have to pretend you’re a dittohead when you call in. Which, every so often, someone does…before getting rudely cut off by the studio gatekeepers on the unseen side of the piss-yellow mike. Rush, notoriously tetchy, doesn’t really like a debate, unless it’s him talking and you saying “Megadittoes!” Which is really not a debate, either; it’s a monologue, and a not terribly enjoyable one to hear.

But of course, the Pigman is NEVER rude! (Stop laughing, you there in the Peanut Gallery!)

Share this story:
Posted in Crapagandarati, Karma 1, Dogma 0, Men Who Just Don't Get It, Not So Compassionate Conservatism, Schadenfreude, The Bold and the Badass, Uppity Wimmin | Comments Off on Ah, memories!

Stupid Sex Tricks: Greece Has Talent

OMG, what do they put in the ouzo? It makes guys musical in all the, uh, most interesting places:

Very nice, fellas! Do you do requests? I wanna hear “Zorba’s Dance”.

Share this story:
Posted in Greek Salad, Stupid Sex Tricks | 2 Comments

“Shame on you!”

Hotel maids in New York turned out en masse to protest Dominique Strauss-Kahn at a legal hearing. I wonder if the French press considers things like this to be “barbaric” and “vulgar”, too.

Share this story:
Posted in Law-Law Land, Schadenfreude, Uppity Wimmin | Comments Off on “Shame on you!”