Festive Left Friday Blogging: UNASUR meets in Guyana…

…and Cristina Fernández of Argentina paid tribute to her late husband (and former president), Néstor Kirchner:

Love how she makes special mention of Chavecito–as a friend as well as a fellow South American president. (Watch when the camera pans across the front row of seats; Chavecito and Evo are sitting side by side. Chavecito can’t resist interjecting with friendly words, of course.) Solidarity is beautiful!

And speaking of beautiful, I couldn’t leave this out:

correa-unasur-guyana.jpg

Rafael Correa, another of Cristina’s amigos. Looking very indomitable, no? He had some nice words of his own, praising the South American union for helping to lower tensions between nations in the South. Their solidarity (there’s that beautiful word again!) helped him and Ecuador overcome a coup attempt just two months ago. Democracy is flourishing in the region, and so is unity. That’s a thing that can’t be priced in dollars…or euros…or any other monetary unit you can name.

Share this story:
Posted in All About Evo, Don't Cry For Argentina, Ecuadorable As Can Be, Festive Left Friday Blogging, Huguito Chavecito, Socialism is Good for Capitalism! | Comments Off on Festive Left Friday Blogging: UNASUR meets in Guyana…

Ecuador: More evidence of a coup

warning-fascism.jpg

Who is this Gustavo Lemos Larrea? And what does he have to do with the “police uprising” that wasn’t? Let Jean-Guy Allard tell you…

Gustavo Lemos, the Ecuadorian who burst into the consulate of Ecuador in Miami during the coup events of September 30, along with a handful of partisans of putschist Lucio Gutiérrez and Cuban-American extremists, has been denounced in his country as a torturer and suspected of having covered up the murders of two teenagers.

Lemos is known in Quito as the chief of the torturers during the reign of Social Christian president León Febres Cordero (1984-1988).

Now based in Miami, with the complicity of the State Department, Lemos was found to be participating, a week before the coup, on September 23, in conspiratory activities co-ordinated by Carlos Alberto Montaner in Miami. Montaner is a CIA agent and fugitive from Cuban justice.

Among the “stars” of that “forum”, there was the former colonel, Lucio Gutiérrez, ex-president of Ecuador, deposed by the people. With his habitual cynicism, Gutiérrez disparaged his homeland, saying “all is totalitarianism and total corruption.”

Gutérrez announced from Miami the end of the political model pursued by President Rafael Correa. Later, from Brasilia, he called for an assassination.

An immigrant with “cover” in Washington and Langley, Lemos frequently gave interviews to Radio Mambí, the mafia station in Miami, to defame President Correa. He presented himself as a spokesman for small opposition groups such as the “Francisco Morazán” Honduran Association and the Ecuadorian Society of the Exterior, both associated with fascists of the Cuban community in Miami who are known for their use of terrorism.

Lemos is also known for his ties to the ex-chief of military intelligence, Mario Pazmiño, who was expelled from the army due to his CIA ties.

In recent months, Lemos has been denounced publicly in Ecuador by the Commission for Truth, in conjunction with several cases of torture, illegal arrest, assassination or disappearances which occurred during the reign of León Febres Cordero.

The commission pressed for a court case against Gustavo Lemos Larrea, along with the government minister Luis Robles Plaza (now deceased), based on evidence that they used torture as a police investigation method.

One of the most repugnant instances of repression in which Lemos is involved is, without doubt, the case of the brothers Restrepo.

On January 8, 1988, the police illegally detained Carlos Santiago and Pedro Andrés Restrepo Arismendy, two brothers aged 17 and 14 years, respectively.

According to a key witness, ex-agent Hugo España, the boys were taken to the Criminal Investigations Service of Pichincha, and tortured for several days by investigators of the National Police. One of them died during a torture session. On January 11, the interrogators killed the second brother, a decision made by Lemos in the office of the minister, Robles Plaza, according to the father of the victims, Pedro Restrepo.

The bodies of the two young brothers were dismembered and thrown in Lake Yambo, in the province of Tunguragua.

Lemos is an ardent partisan of colonel Lucio Gutiérrez, the most visible head of the conspiracy and assassination attempt of September 30.

According the the TC Televisión (of Quito) program, In Search of the Truth, close collaborators and partners of the ousted president, Gutiérrez, and of Carlos Vera, ex-TV host and opposition activist, are involved as protagonists of the “police uprising” of September 30.

Among other key players in the failed coup attempt is acting colonel (in passive service) Galo Monteverde, who led the demonstrations called by Vera. Monteverde participated along with Gutiérrez in the coup d’état against then-president Jamil Mahuad, in January 2000.

Fidel Araujo, militant of the Patriotic Society (SP); Pablo Guerrero, ex-attorney for Lucio Gutiérrez; and Max Marin, of the SP, met in the police station. Meanwhile, the brother of the putschist colonel supported the operation in the Parliament, giving instructions to the Legislative Guard, with the complicity of politicians such as Lourdes Tibán, assembly member of the Pachakutik party; Luis Villacís, of the Popular Democratic Movement, and fascists of the movement “Madera de Guerrero”.

Translation mine.

I’ve already blogged about Pachakutik and its allies in the indigenous group CONAIE, and their strange denial of what was quite obviously a coup. By now, it’s also obvious that Sucio Lucio Gutiérrez is a key villain, and probably in control of CONAIE and Pachakutik both. Get a load of what else I found while looking for photos (which I have yet to find) of the shadowy Gustavo Lemos…

An old State Dept. report on Ecuador, in which CONAIE figures prominently among putschists trying to install Sucio as president in the wake of a coup against Jamil Mahuad:

On January 19, approximately 6,000 persons including members of the Confederation of Ecuador’s Indian Nationalities (CONAIE), students, and leftwing political protesters marched in Quito. On January 21, thousands of protesters, including members of CONAIE, students, teachers, and union members, occupied and took control of the congressional building in Quito. The police and military guarding the building did not oppose the occupation with force, and over 100 soldiers joined the protesters. CONAIE leader Antonio Vargas announced on television from the floor of Congress that he would head the People’s Parliament. He also said that retired army Colonel Lucio Gutierrez would join him in a new “ruling junta” as the executive, and that former Supreme Court President Carlos Solorzano would take over the role of Supreme Court President. The protesters called for President Mahuad to resign. (There also were protests in Guayaquil, where a group of students, unionists, and neighborhood associations seized the provincial government building.)

President of Congress Juan Jose Pons described the small military group that joined the protests as “seditious” and called for support for the democratically elected Government. Mahuad then spoke on television and refused to resign. On the afternoon of January 21, the armed forces service chiefs and joint staff chief General Carlos Mendoza called for the President to resign. Mahuad resisted the call to resign but later fled the palace. The junta (also called the “triumvirate”) originally was composed of Vargas, Solorzano, and Colonel Gutierrez. Later during the night of January 21, at the palace, General Mendoza briefly joined the junta, replacing Colonel Gutierrez. On January 22, President Mahuad appeared again on television and accepted Vice President Gustavo Noboa as president; on the same day, Congress ruled that Mahuad had deserted his post. With Noboa’s assumption of office, order was restored.

And what a coinkydink! CONAIE were front and centre in trying to deny the putschist coup–again, spearheaded by Sucio–this time against a much more popular president, namely Rafael Correa. Whose popularity has only increased since then.

Meanwhile, it looks like Gustavo Lemos is in legal trouble. According to the EFE news agency, Lemos is under investigation, by Correa’s gove
rnment, for those very crimes he committed during the 1980s, including the murders of the two brothers mentioned by Allard in the piece I translated. Looks like this one will be one to watch in the future, kiddies.

Share this story:
Posted in Cops Behaving Badly, Ecuadorable As Can Be, Fascism Without Swastikas, Isn't That Illegal? | 4 Comments

Finally, signs of intelligent life at the Christian Science Monitor

sky-is-falling.jpg

Well, its Latin America desk, at any rate.

One in 10 South Americans – about 38 million people – escaped poverty during the past decade. That’s remarkable progress by any measure.

Contrast that with the United States, where poverty has been growing due to a decade-long stagnation of income for the middle class and the Great Recession. In 2009, the US had more poor people than in any of the 51 years since poverty levels have been estimated.

Of course, America’s poor are far better off than South America’s poor. And the US still has a much lower poverty rate (14.2 percent versus around 70 percent). South America remains infamous for huge income gaps between a tiny elite and masses of people making, often, just $1 or $2 a day.

Still, 10 years of growing prosperity has shrunk that gap. The credit goes to democratic leftist governments that have vastly boosted social spending to help the poor, maintains Mark Weisbrot, a left-of-center economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington.

Half of that improvement comes from Brazil. Under outgoing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, the nation pushed up the minimum wage a real 65 percent in eight years, helping to raise the wages of tens of millions of workers, including many receiving more than minimum wage. A program offered small cash grants to poor families if they sent their children to school.

The results? Real income per person is up some 24 percent since 2000. Illiteracy is down. Poverty has been halved since 2002; extreme poverty is down by 70 percent, says Mr. Weisbrot, pulling more than 19 million people into the middle class.

And the economy hasn’t suffered. Unemployment under Mr. da Silva’s presidency dropped from more than 11 percent to 6.7 percent. Income inequality has fallen considerably.

Okay, couple of quibblettes here: Brazil gets the lion’s share of the positive mention. I’m guessing that’s due to its enormous population, of which so many are poor (or extremely poor) that it was too glaringly obvious to ignore just how bad they had it before Lula and his rather modest reforms came along. Plus, under the neo-con code of US journalism on Latin America, cuddly little Ewok-y Lula counts as “good left” because he’s not too radical or too critical of Washington, the World Bank, and the IMF. Not like, say, a certain big handsome Venezuelan whom Mark Weisbrot likes to mention quite a bit:

Other nations with “progressive” governments have made much social progress, notes Weisbrot. He lists Bolivia, Ecuador, Argentina, and Venezuela. Under President Hugo Chávez, attacked by the right in the US, oil-rich Venezuela has tripled social spending per person since 2003. Attendance at universities has doubled. Most of the poor now get health care under a government program.

Okay, here comes another quibblette: Why the unnecessary quotation marks around the word progressive? The governments of all those countries surely deserve better than that disparaging little trick of punctuation, since all have made impressive socio-economic recoveries under their progressive leaders. Much better, since they are all much improved.

Still, I shouldn’t complain too loudly; after all, the piece doesn’t then go on to undercut all that talk of progressives and their progresses with vague, unsubstantiated noises about “tyranny”, the way so many other English-language whore media pieces (including previous ones in the selfsame Monitor) have done. Instead, we get…more relatively decent reporting:

The continent weathered the financial crisis relatively well. Social spending rose. So there was no big rise in poverty, says Norbert Schady, an economic adviser to the Inter-American Development Bank, speaking from Quito, Ecuador.

Moreover, prospects for continued economic progress are strong. The Institute of International Finance (IIF), set up by the world’s biggest banks, forecasts 6 percent growth in gross domestic product in Latin America this year, which includes Mex­ico and Central America as well as South Am­er­ica. That growth should shrink poverty further.

By contrast, the IIF forecasts a 2.5 percent growth rate this year for the US. At that slow pace the US could see a further rise in poverty.

South America’s new economic vigor is also causing a geopolitical shift. The US has long considered Latin America part of its political and economic sphere of influence. Officials running South America’s left-of-center governments often charge the US with imperial ambitions.

But as US growth slows, South America’s businesses have reached out to other markets. While 15 percent of South America’s trade is still with the US, a greater share is tied to Europe. Also, trade within the continent is growing with a free-trade deal. So South American governments no longer feel so much under the thumb of the US.

All of this is unquestionably true, and it’s refreshing to see it in the Monitor for a change. Normally I’d have to go to a progressive alternative or independent media site, like the Socialist Worker, or end up translating something from a LatAm indymedia site here. I have to say it’s pleasantly surprising…

Oh wait, I just noticed something: The byline is David R. Francis. Perhaps the honest, even and objective tone of this piece owes to the fact that it wasn’t written by the famously blinkered Sara Miller Llana? I bet it does.

Congratulations, Mr. Francis, on your journalistic breakthrough. And oh yeah: Watch your back. They don’t like to see too many nice things being said about Chavecito, Evo, Cristina or El Ecuadorable in there.

Share this story:
Posted in All About Evo, Brazil is the Bomb!, Crapagandarati, Don't Cry For Argentina, Ecuadorable As Can Be, Free Trade, My Ass!, Huguito Chavecito, Isn't It Ironic?, Socialism is Good for Capitalism! | Comments Off on Finally, signs of intelligent life at the Christian Science Monitor

Why is Jason Kenney afraid of this man?

George Galloway was in Calgary yesterday. He wanted to have a few polite words with Jason Kenney, who was responsible for debarring him from the country awhile back, on ridiculously specious grounds. As you can see, he’s very polite, and he says nothing disagreeable here…unless, of course, you find the truth objectionable. As Jason Kenney undoubtedly does, or he would have let George Galloway in the first time. Galloway is far less obnoxious than the Coultergeist, who lies as easily as she breathes. And Jason Kenney had no problem with her, even though she is an open supporter of terrorism and likes to throw verbal bombs all the time.

So…why IS Jason Kenney afraid of George Galloway? Whom does peace threaten?

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Canadian Counterpunch, Crapagandarati | 1 Comment

More on the RT arrest at the School of the Assassins

Reporter Kaelyn Forde, of Russia Today’s US TV crew, is roughed up and shackled with garbage-bag ties in this raw video. The press pass is clearly visible on a cord around her neck. The cop (or rent-a-cop?) cuffing her claims she was told to move “five times”.

Only in a police state are the media arrested for doing their jobs. Like I said earlier: Fascism and torture can’t bear closer scrutiny.

Share this story:
Posted in Fascism Without Swastikas, Isn't That Illegal? | 2 Comments

“Where the fuck is the conductor?”

ADDENDUM: Didn’t see this yesterday, but here’s a telling thing…there are actual websites devoted to guys doing what you see below.

A woman on the New York subway system confronts a wanker (a literal one!) who harassed her. Apparently he kept rubbing up against her with his penis out.

Happily, the comments on this YouTube are mostly positive…and in favor of the woman who wouldn’t be intimidated. A representative sampling:

LOVE HER. No woman should ever back down to this kind of behavior.

Because it’s actually so much better that they just surround him! There is nothing he can do. He can’t even reach down to put his dick back in his pants because everyone will see. He’s fucked now. There’s about 4 cameras on him and he’s standing there with his dick hidden behind a bag, the police will be all over him.

She’s so hot to me.  Best comment: ‘Oh this shit is going on youtube yo.’

Ginger Power!! She is my hero for today!! 😀

This woman is a BAMF.* Good for her.

LOL, I hope his life is ruined. This happened to me several years ago and I confronted the guy. Would have sprayed him with mace if there hadn’t been dozens of people nearby. He ran like a little bitch out of the train station. That’s right, you do this kind of thing and you lose your “man” card.

This woman gets my full respect, for calling out an obvious sexual predator. It takes a lot of guts to publicly shame a pervert like this, as perfectly and loudly as she did, and I think if more women stood up for their rights in this straight-forward way more often, if and/or when they are assaulted, we would be better for it. The fact that the other men on the train are also helping to keep the moron waiting for the conductor is heartening, as are some of their words of wisdom: Ridiculous man!

And then there are the inevitable jokers:

Sometimes it just needs to breathe a little is all.

KEEP IT DOWN LADY IM TRYING TO RUB MY DICK ON YOU

And then there’s pure, dick-smacking ignorance:

I called her a cunt not because she spoke up but because of the way she did it. It’s just apparent to me–and many others–that this woman is a bitch. Look at her facial expressions. Listen to her tone of voice. She has all the grace of a hall monitor. It was probably the first penis she’s ever seen.

You guys have it all wrong. If you’ve never flashed some peen on a subway, you’ve never lived. This bro was just living. That’s all. Why can’t you let a man live? This is AMERICA!

Yeah, that’s right; there’s that legendary wingnut logic at work. She’s a bitch who doesn’t believe in letting guys “live”. And “living” entails showing your shit to someone with no interest in seeing it. On a public subway. Where anyone else can witness her fear and humiliation (and in this case, several others did.)

But y’know what? Maybe, just maybe, these dick-smackers would think twice about “living” that way if they knew that their shit was gonna be shown–and insulted–on the Internets, eh?

laffing-interwebz.jpg

(h/t Hollaback!)

*BAMF = BadAssMotherFucker, in case you wondered.

Share this story:
Posted in Isn't That Illegal?, Men Who Just Don't Get It, Uppity Wimmin | Comments Off on “Where the fuck is the conductor?”

Viva Evo, FU CIA!

prensa-canalla.jpg

“If the press is a nest of thugs, let the walls speak!”

Need a laugh this dreary Monday morning? Have I got the giggles for you…

Bolivian President Evo Morales had a blunt message for the visiting U.S. Pentagon chief on Monday: Latin American nations will pick their own friends and business partners, including Iran, regardless of U.S. opinion.

The colorful leftist leader delivered an hourlong welcome to delegates at a regional defense conference that included U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Morales never mentioned Gates by name. But most of the speech, and all of the applause lines, were clearly directed at the Pentagon chief and former head of the CIA.

Bolivia is more democratic and representative than the United States, Morales said, and democracy would improve in the entire region if the United States stopped interfering.

He mentioned the spread of Iranian and Russian business and other ties in Latin America, and said it is not the U.S. place to complain.

“Bolivia under my government will have an agreement, an alliance, to anyone in the world,” Morales said. “Nobody will forbid us,” he said to applause.

Okay, you say…so where’s the funny? Other than that snarky, crypto-racist use of “colorful” to describe an elected president who happens to be indigenous, maybe? Hang on, hang on, I’m getting to it…

Gates did not directly respond, and didn’t seem fazed by the one-hour monologue. A day earlier he had warned that countries doing business with Iran should remember that Iran is under international sanctions over its nuclear program. He also questioned whether Iran has the technical capability to help another nations develop civilian nuclear power.

“As a sovereign sate Bolivia obviously can have relationships with any country in the world that it wishes to,” Gates said Sunday. “I think Bolivia needs to be mindful of the number of United Nations Security Council resolutions that have been passed with respect to Iran’s behavior.”

That’s the beginning of it. CIA honcho Robert Gates, completely tone-deaf, is trying to tell Bolivia (where even the poorest people know the score by heart) what tune the US wants it to sing. STILL.

But wait, there’s more:

Morales ticked off a history of attempted coups, alleged election- and vote-tampering, military meddling and vague conspiracies involving the United States. Some of it is based in truth, although the U.S. denies that a former ambassador tried to engineer a coup against Morales in 2008, as he alleged Monday.

Morales kicked out the then-U.S. ambassador in 2008, and the two nations have not normalized diplomatic relations since. Morales also expelled the U.S. DEA on suspicion of espionage.

Here’s where the AP reporters–three of them for one lousy story!–get funny with us, too. The US can deny all it likes, but anyone who’s been following me, Otto, or El Duderino in recent years knows that Philip Goldberg has, indeed, pushed for a putsch. And on more than one occasion. Why else all those secret midnight meetings with prominent (and putschist) opposition “leaders”? And why else would Goldilocks the Failure fall up…and straight into a cushy intel desk job in Washington?

And while we’re on the subject of espionage, the DEA isn’t merely “suspected” of it. They are proven to be in it to their eyeballs. Ask former DEA agent Celerino Castillo if you don’t believe me. The DEA is not only a nest of spies, it’s also a drug smuggling cartel big enough to make all of Colombia blush with shame.

But wait…our three amigos still have a few punchlines left:

He denies that coca grown in Bolivia feeds the worldwide demand for cocaine, although the country produces vastly more of the crop that would be needed for its traditional and legal medicinal use in Bolivia.

Notice that they don’t supply a single fact or statistic to back up that contention. How much exactly IS “vastly more…than would be needed”, Messrs. AP reporter-dudes? And why no mention of the top cash crops of Colombia and Peru…neither of which is coffee?

Well, let’s not waste time waiting for a cogent answer there, kids, there’s more horseshit still waiting in the Augean Stable that is AP’s LatAm bureau:

Morales also alleged U.S. involvement in coup attempts or political upheaval in Venezuela in 2002, Honduras in 2009 and Ecuador in 2010.

“The empire of the United States won,” in Honduras, Morales said, a reference to the allegations of former Honduran President Manuel Zelaya that the U.S. was behind his ouster.

“The people of the Americas in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador, we won,” Morales continued. “We are three to one with the United States. Let’s see what the future brings.”

U.S. officials have repeatedly denied involvement in all of those cases and critics of the United States have produced no clear evidence.

And the AP, like the good presstitutes they are, lick it all up and don’t even bother to report the fact that ample, clear evidence to the contrary has, in fact, been produced by the alternative media, the blogosphere, and the state-funded and community media all over Latin America. Hell, all I’ve had to do is translate a few of those articles to demonstrate that the US and the AP are both lying. Or if that’s not enough, I can also refer you to Machetera, who’s done an excellent job of unpacking what really happened in Honduras.

But here’s the final jab from our trio of bumblers, and it too is a doozer:

Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa called a Sept. 30 police revolt over benefit cuts a coup attempt in disguise, but he did not accuse the United States of being involved.

Actually, Correa did, although he also says he does not believe President Obama is involved. Hilariously, the AP themselves reported this, although it all seems to have gone down the memory hole now!

And there is plenty of history to bear him out that the US, and particularly the CIA, has long been behind Ecuador’s apparent instability. Philip Agee, the late former CIA agent, has written extensively about it in his book, Inside the Company: CIA Diary. One of Agee’s postings was to Ecuador. The CIA’s modus operandi was to co-opt a country’s police and military forces, and sponsor opposition parties, non-governmental “civil society” organizations, and the like. And where no suitable “civil society” orgs existed, it invariably ginned up some fake ones to make it look as though there was extensive opposition to a popular leader who wasn’t toeing the proper line. By doing so, the CIA created–and still creates–pretexts for coups, which are then passed of
f as mere “revolts”, like the failed September 30 putsch in Ecuador. This one, predictably, was passed off as a police revolt, aided and abetted by a USAID-corrupted indigenous group, CONAIE. I’ve written about them before; here’s another blogger’s viewpoint, which seems to buttress mine quite nicely.

And oh yeah, Evo is quite right about the Honduran coup, too. That one was backed by Washington, and there was no disguising where the sympathies lay.

But you’ll never hear that from the AP. They can assign three reporters to one story and still not tell you what you really need to know. All they’ll do is make up bad fiction for the benefit of the CIA. Woe betide you if you believe a word of it.

Viva Evo, FU CIA…and FOAD, AP.

Share this story:
Posted in All About Evo, Crapagandarati, Cuba, Libre (de los Yanquis), El NarcoPresidente, Fascism Without Swastikas, Inca Dink-a-Doo, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Illegal?, Newspeak is Nospeak, Not Hiding in Honduras, Obamarama! | Comments Off on Viva Evo, FU CIA!

Russian TV crew arrested at the School of the Assassins

Your take-away lesson here, kiddies: Fascism and torture cannot bear closer scrutiny. Why else shut out a camera crew covering a protest against a “democratic” school teaching those things?

Share this story:
Posted in Fascism Without Swastikas, If You REALLY Care, Isn't It Ironic?, Teh Russkies | Comments Off on Russian TV crew arrested at the School of the Assassins

Music for a Sunday: Highly strung like nervous guitars

I’m not afraid to call it love. This weirdest and most wondrous song of Martha and the Muffins has been with me since I was 14. And in spite of its jarring aspects–or maybe because of them–I could just swim in it still.

And speaking of weird ‘n’ wonderful stuff you could swim in, Calle 13 does it in Spanish. Clicky here and follow the linkies to listen.

Share this story:
Posted in Music for a Sunday | Comments Off on Music for a Sunday: Highly strung like nervous guitars

Stupid Sex Tricks: I’ll have what she’s having

In Catalonia, they do democratic socialism…a little differently:

Yes, that’s an actual PSA from the youth wing of the Socialist Party of Catalonia.

Stupid sex comment, at the site: “She’s orgasming because the government is fucking her!!” Please thumb this idiot down.

Share this story:
Posted in Stupid Sex Tricks, Under the Name of Spain | 4 Comments