Roy Romanow’s message to Barack Obama

A former (NDP!) premier of Saskatchewan, Canada’s first province with single-payer healthcare, speaks out, along with others in the medical and nursing fields:

US visitors, please spread this message. Grab the YouTube and put it on your blogs, or link to it in forums. The advice in it is very important, especially the part about “trying to cross a chasm in two steps”. Right now, that’s exactly what Obama is trying to do–and it’s exactly why his plan is in so much jeopardy. Learn from Tommy Douglas–do it all in one, and play hardball if you have to. The end result is worth it!

Share this story:
Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Obamarama! | 4 Comments

Music for a Sunday: Remembering Katrina

Ray Nagin and Led Zeppelin–a duet made in hell on Earth.

“Wonder why I got my middle finger up down here?” I don’t. After four years, it’s still not fixed. And the racists are still gloating. So, when is Cthulhu coming for THEM?

Share this story:
Posted in Environmentally Ill, Music for a Sunday | Comments Off on Music for a Sunday: Remembering Katrina

Yay

shoe-throw.jpg

I would argue that this guy should never have gone to prison at all (he’s a hero for doing what he did!), but hey–at least he’s getting out:

An Iraqi journalist jailed after hurling his shoes at former President George W. Bush will be released next month after his sentence was reduced for good behavior, his lawyer said Saturday.

Muntadhar al-Zeidi’s act during Bush’s last visit to Iraq as president turned the 30-year-old reporter into a folk hero across the Arab world amid anger over the 2003 invasion.

He has been in custody since the Dec. 14 outburst, which occurred as Bush was holding a joint news conference with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

He was initially sentenced to three years after pleading not guilty to assaulting a foreign leader, then the court reduced it to one year because the journalist had no prior criminal history.

Defense attorney Karim al-Shujairi said al-Zeidi will now be released on Sept. 14, three months early.

“We have been informed officially about the court decision,” al-Shujairi told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. “His release will be a victory for the free and honorable Iraqi media.”

Off early for good behavior? Sentence reduced for having no priors?

Well, shit.

What he did was nothing but good old-fashioned freedom of speech. In the Arab world, it’s customary to show the bottom of your feet–or the soles of your shoes–to anyone you hold in absolute contempt. This gesture was less an assault than it was a harangue, especially since neither shoe hit its target. I think he was being jailed to send a message to anyone else who might be considering telling King George the Dubya, in no uncertain terms, where to get off. And the message was: Don’t even think about it.

This ruling, while welcome, is just a good end to a bad situation. It would have been a real victory for press freedom in Iraq if he had never been taken into custody in the first place, but of course, nobody–not even the “War President” and self-styled liberator–was willing to let Iraq’s supposed newfound freedom actually go that far!

Share this story:
Posted in Law-Law Land, The War on Terra, W is for Weak (and Stupid) | Comments Off on Yay

Why have we not heard of Marwa al-Sherbini?

First, a bit of backgrounder, courtesy of al-Jazeera–the only major English-speaking network to have given this shocking murder story ANY coverage:

And now, I weigh in.

When I googled for Marwa’s story, to find out the particulars, I got this blog post at the top of my search. The post is excellent in itself; I have no problems with it. What bugs me is that the very first comment it got…is THIS:

All hate crimes are horrible. Yet you perceive this with blinders on. Most Muslim women murdered in Europe are murdered by their father’s or husband’s in honor killings. How many women have been murdered for wearing a veil? One. How many have been killed for refusing to? Hundreds if not more. Also, hate crimes like this have happened in Europe and the USA where it was the Muslim who was the perpertrator. I live in Seattle where a Muslim opened fire on a Jewish Center last year killing one and seriously wounding four. Why didn’t the Muslim media report on it?

…which sounds to me like it’s just a hair away from justifying the exact racism and bigotry that led to Marwa’s death in the first place. “They do it to (fill in the blanks), so tit for tat.” The “why didn’t the Muslim media report on it” bit is also a sweeping generalization: How does this “jane doe” know they didn’t? Can she read Arabic? Has she scoured the “Muslim media” for the report she claims did not exist? My educated guess is that she doesn’t know, can’t read Arabic, and hasn’t done a damn thing except fire off at the keyboard to diminish the impact of a death that should not be minimized under any circumstances. Very slick work on the part of “jane” to deflect people’s attention from the horrific facts of Marwa’s death. (Happily, lots of other readers–including Muslims who DO follow the Arabic-language media–take her to task for her lies.)

This tendency to minimalize the violent deaths of those who don’t blend in with Western society fits right in with what I blogged two days ago, about the Canadian government being willfully and selectively blind to the abuse perpetrated against Muslim Canadians abroad. It amounts to undeclared institutional racism. In Germany, similar things are happening, and on local soil. Since I am the daughter of two German immigrants myself, this touches me where I live. I cannot afford to be blind to this sort of thing. After all, I blog the news that goes unreported or underreported here.

And yes, Marwa’s death is big news. I am ashamed to say that it is news to me, totally unknown until today. A full two months after it occurred. How could this be?

Marwa’s murder occurred in eastern Germany. That’s significant in itself, because the “Eastzone”, as it’s called, has lingering socio-economic problems dating back to before reunification. Ingo Hasselbach, an East German who used to be a leading neo-Nazi in the area, wrote extensively on those problems in his memoir, Führer-Ex. Kids disaffected by the failures of sovietism (not to be confused with socialism, or even communism) and further disenchanted by the failed economic promises of capitalism, have a high risk of becoming the very thugs their parents and grandparents were rightly taught to abhor. Eastern Germany still lags behind the western three-quarters in terms of jobs, education and health. It is, in short, a perfect storm of the circumstances that breed fascism and xenophobia. And it has the violent crime statistics to prove it.

Moreover, Marwa’s murderer was a Russian national (claiming German ethnicity). No doubt he came to Germany in hopes of finding better prospects than were in store for him back home (post-Soviet Russia is in even worse shape than East Germany.) He landed in the depressed Eastzone–and, predictably, found nothing. Meanwhile, there was Marwa, right next door. Another immigrant, but with a difference: She had a job, an education, a growing young family. She had much to live for; she had, in short, a future. Something the murderer did not have.

But what really galled him, I’ll bet, was that Marwa was a Muslim. She wasn’t acting like a “proper” second-class citizen. She wore her headscarf openly and didn’t try to look assimilated. How dare someone like that behave as if she belonged? (Which she did?) To his twisted reckoning, she must have been a terrorist–someone out to impose Islam on the west. The sort of people the shitty racist “anti-jihad” pundits, like Mark Steyn, are always “warning” us about.

Or maybe not; maybe he just called her that because of pure spite and resentment. Possibly it was the product of all this and more. Whatever it was, she took him to court for it. And right there, in the courtroom, in front of everybody, he stabbed her to death. 18 knife-thrusts in all.

Marwa’s death caused a huge outcry in Germany as well as in Marwa’s native Egypt (and throughout the Arab/Muslim world), but news of it somehow failed to make it across the big pond. Meanwhile, the media here were all over the death of Neda, the Iranian woman killed during protests against the Ahmadinejad government, literally like flies on a carcass. Why was Neda’s story so much hotter than Marwa’s?

Maybe it’s because the anti-jihadis were quick to seize on Neda’s death as proof that Islam is inherently evil and murderous. After all, those who killed her were believed to be agents of the so-called Islamic Republic. Visibility is also an issue, albeit a secondary one; Neda’s death was caught on camera and broadcast via Internet, but Marwa’s wasn’t. The anti-islamists therefore had more graphic “evidence” to exploit. But most of all, I think it’s because Marwa was killed by an obvious islamophobe, while Neda was killed by an alleged islamist. Apparently, a Muslim who kills is a worse person than a killer of Muslims–so runs the logic, no?

Now, why is it worse for a killer to be Muslim than white, presumably Christian, etc.? The antis would probably justify their unequal consideration by saying it’s because those people are all violent, all terrorists, all out to impose their religion on the west by force. The fact that nothing of the sort has happened makes no nevermind to them. “They’re just lying in wait”, is the standard response you’re likely to hear. “They’re still plotting it, still waiting for all you dhimmis to fall in line before dropping the hammer.”

Well, there’s a fine bit of projection. And you’re just as likely to hear it coming from the slimeballs at Stormfront, where the lying-in-wait, the plotting, and the hope that conditions will ripen into favorability are all running rampant…among the very people who are out to exterminate anyone who doesn’t “breed” correctly.

What makes all these rightard bloggers and pundits any better than those neo-Nazis? What makes them any better than the kind of person Ingo Hasselbach was before he saw the light and left the movement? The fact that Mark Steyn used to be Jewish (he’s now a Catholic)? Gimme a fucking break. Adolf Hitler probably had Jewish ancestors too, and he was definitely a practicing Catholic. Does that make him any less of an antisemite, any less a murderer of Jews?

As far as I’m concerned, if you’re on the right-hand side of the political spectrum and you subscribe to or defend this kind of beliefs, this attitude that “they” are out to oubreed “us”, you fit right in with the neo-Nazis. Why not go on over there and join them in
earnest? They’re looking for recruits. I’m sure they’ll be happy to have you. And it will be easier for me to identify you if I can see a swastika tattooed right there on your big dumb forehead.

But if you’re really NOT a racist, and NOT a bigot, and you find those swastika-wearing thugs abhorrent, then you’d better wake up and speak out. Wake up to the death of Marwa al-Sherbini. Speak out against bigotry. Wake up to the fizzing brew of insanity and inhumanity that got into the killer’s blood. Start using free speech for its true purpose–denouncing–and stop defending racist and fascist blather on the grounds of freedom of speech simply because they’re “unpopular”. They’re not, in fact. They’re very popular indeed, as anyone who’s been on the receiving end of the brutal end product of such speech could tell you…assuming s/he lived to tell the tale.

Marwa al-Sherbini did not.

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Confessions of a Bad German, Fascism Without Swastikas, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land | Comments Off on Why have we not heard of Marwa al-Sherbini?

Wankers of the Week: Ted Kennedy memorial edition

ted-kennedy-dead.jpg

This week, we honor a man who, like his brothers before him, made a career of public service. And who better to show what a public DISservice is, than those who dishonor him? Yes, folks…here are this week’s public fappers, and here’s this week’s public thwap:

1. Andrew Fucking Breitbart. Please, people–don’t get any “news” off his website, boycott his sponsors, and stay the fuck away from his Twitterings. You are feeding a booze-addled, pop-eyed, dough-bellied, frowsy-haired TROLL. Or, to quote Bitefart himself, “a special pile of human excrement”. Class? Decorum? Compassion? Any virtue at all? Him no haz it.

2. Joseph Fucking Farah no haz any, either. Hairball remedy, Joe? You sound like you could use it. Also, heh.

3. And Joe, when you’re done with the bottle of Hairball-B-Gone, don’t forget to pass it around to these fucking conservatwits. Meghan McCain (who DOES haz class, and to spare) didn’t spank those flying monkeys NEARLY hard enough.

4. Rush Fucking Limbaugh. Figures the Pigman would gloat about Sen. Kennedy dying before the healthcare reform he advocated would pass. Guess what, OxyMoron–nobody’s gonna visit your grave except maybe to dance and/or piss on it. Ted, like his brothers, will get pilgrims. Dust THAT on your stinky cigar and smoke it! We wanna hear you cough and wheeze your last REAL soon. (Better still, blow an artery on the air, you fat sack of shit. I’m sure I’m not the only one who has a bottle of champagne waiting just for THAT occasion.)

5. Sarah Fucking Palin’s Facebook “friends”. Trollops one and all. Won’t be missed when THEY are gone, either.

6. Andrew Fucking Klavan. Until now, I had never heard of this dickhead. I wish that were still the case. Oh well, another one who won’t be missed when it comes time. Too bad that time won’t come nearly soon enough.

7. Bob Fucking Owens, alias Confederate Yankee. Basically, shitty used-car salesman with a whiny accent, living in the North, bitter that the South ain’t risin’ agiiiiiiiin (and that he still ain’t got hisself a brand-new barby-cue), takes out all his bilious ire on a corpse from Massachusetts. Once more, with feeling: Will not be missed, etc.

8. The Fucking Wankeress–er, sorry, I meant to type Anchoress. Say, aren’t nuns supposed to take vows of poverty, chastity, and all that crap? What, then, is this one doing with a computer, ho’ing around in the wingnut blogosphere? Oh yeah: Chappafuckingquiddick. Self-righteousness blogged large. Jesus appropriately pissed. Have I said “won’t be missed” yet?

9. Nick Fucking Gillespie. Someone please tell him that he just blowdried his own already feeble brains out. Ah well, won’t be missed…but that vegetative state IS rather disturbing.

10. Jonah Fucking Goldberg. Srsly, who cares what the illegitimate spawn of LBJ “thinks” about anything? Won’t be missed!

And in closing, I reiterate the mean thing “mauser” said at Dr. Dawg’s blog. The only true bad thing anyone could say about Ted Kennedy, in my humble estimation. Sleep well, old lion.

Share this story:
Posted in Obits and 'bobs, Wankers of the Week | 13 Comments

Another nail for the imperial coffin

Or should that be a screw? You know, the kind they put to people when torturing them?

uncle-sam-torture-drill.jpg

Moral high ground: guess who no haz it.

According to the report, written by the CIA’s former inspector general, John Helgerson, one CIA interrogator told Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the 9/11 attacks that “We’re going to kill your children” if there was another terror strike on US soil. Another interrogator allegedly tried to convince Abd al-Nashiri, who allegedly devised the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen in 2000, that his mother would be sexually assaulted in front of him, a claim that the operative has denied.

[…]

US laws on torture forbid threatening a detainee with death. The report said that at least Mr al-Nashiri was hooded, handcuffed and threatened with a gun and a power drill. Another detainee was forced to listen to a gunshot in a nearby room, with the aim of making him think that a fellow detainee had just been executed.

Emphasis added.

The nice part is, this is all happening because citizens who believe in human rights for everyone did a little screw-putting of their own:

Mr Holder’s decision was bolstered by a recommendation from his Justice Department’s ethics office to reopen nearly a dozen alleged abuse cases. “I fully realise my decision … will be controversial,” Mr Holder said last night.

As Mr Holder reopens investigations into the actions of CIA interrogators, human rights groups and many Democrats are urging him also to focus on the Bush-era officials who, they claim, authorised the abusive methods. They are particularly focused on the Bush-era Justice Department lawyers who wrote legal guidelines for the CIA in 2002, redefining torture to allow techniques such as waterboarding, which simulates drowning, and severe physical abuse.

“The important thing now is that any action doesn’t focus solely on the people who carried out the torture, but on the people who gave the orders and who wrote the legal memos which facilitated torture,” said Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU.

Of course, they did it without torture.

There’s a valuable lesson or two in here. Let’s see if those who need it will learn it.

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land, Obamarama!, The War on Terra, W is for Weak (and Stupid) | Comments Off on Another nail for the imperial coffin

Colonel Benavides, terror of the Venezuelan oppos

Meet my newest hero:

His name is Antonio Benavides Torres, and he is a colonel in the Venezuelan national guard. Chavecito recently awarded him the country’s highest honor–the Medal of the Liberator.

So what did Col. Benavides do to deserve it? Have a look:

What? No battle? No blood? No drama?

That’s right. Col. Benavides kept the public peace. He played the music of Venezuela’s most popular folk singer, the late Alí Primera, to counteract the ugly crap being blasted at the recent oppo demo. And when the oppos tried to provoke the national guard and the metropolitan Caracas police into starting a riot, the colonel wasn’t having any of it. He grabbed a mike and told his troops not to fall into the trap–that this was an oppo strategy to generate violence and try to force the expulsion of President Chávez. When a reporter from oppo channel Globovisión tried to get in his face and provoke a direct confrontation, he headed her off and told her to get back and record her “ambient sound” from a respectful distance. Result: No drama–and no excuse to get rid of the president. And no satisfaction whatsoever for Globoterror’s crew, who went away with their tails between their legs.

Peace, democracy and socialism win again. The End.

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Crapagandarati, Huguito Chavecito | 2 Comments

Festive Left Friday Blogging: The last man on horseback?

Chavecito’s famous revolutionary ancestor, Maisanta, was the subject of a biography called The Last Man on Horseback. Well, looks like his great-grandson is following in his footsteps…er, better make that hoofprints:

chavecito-horseback.jpg

Looks like he’s more than comfortable leading the cabalgata, himself:

chavecito-horseback2.jpg

¡Arriba Chavecito!

Share this story:
Posted in Festive Left Friday Blogging, Huguito Chavecito | 1 Comment

Shaming us all as Canadians

first-they-came-shirt.jpg

I have this shirt, BTW. And there is a very good reason why I have it…

As a Canadian, I am deeply ashamed.

I am ashamed of how, for all that we pride ourselves on our multiculturalism, when push comes to shove–when people from a culture the rest of us barely understand (if we understand it at all) are mistreated abroad–we, as Canadians, seem all too happy to shrug our shoulders and let it happen–that is, until the mistreated ones are forced to fight back to the point where we are all, collectively, embarrassed. And only then do those with the power to do something about it finally do the right thing. But they tend to do it in a too-little-too-late sort of way. And it’s all because of the culture–or more correctly, cultures–of the mistreated ones.

Yes, people, I’m talking here about Canadian Muslims. People with names like Suaad Hagi Mohamud, or Abousfian Abdelrazik, or Maher Arar, or even Omar Khadr. They are all very different from one another, but they all have one thing in common: they are Muslims.

Well, actually, they have something else in common, too: They were neglected and/or shat upon by our own government precisely because they are Muslims.

Ever since 9-11, it’s been hard to talk about Islam–what it really means, what it doesn’t. It shouldn’t be. There are over a billion Muslims in the world, and how many of them are hardcore, far-right, plane-smashing-into-buildings jihadists? As I recall, it only took 19 of them to pull off the infamous events of that day in 2001, plus a couple of paymasters wiring cash back and forth.

And there was not a vast conspiracy of the entire world of Islam behind them, no matter what any scaremongering turd from the punditocracy (or any screeching fruitbat from the blogosphere) says. Out of a billion or more people, only a few hundred or thousand have gone in for terror training; fewer still actually pulled off an attack. A great many one-time terror trainees have chickened out, and some have even informed on their erstwhile comrades.

But even these (who far outnumber the actual suicide bombers) are a very small subset. The majority abhor all terroristic behavior, calling it un-Islamic, and rightly so. Most of the world’s Muslims in fact live by the laws of the land, even when those laws are secular, and they have no interest in imposing Sharia on non-believers–through terror or otherwise. Here in Canada, there was widespread misinterpretation of some proposed changes to Ontario’s faith-based divorce arbitration law–changes that would have been inclusive of Muslims, but definitely did not impose “backdoor Sharia”, as the screamers all feared it would. (The point later became moot when the Ontario goverment scrapped the proposal, mainly in response to pressure from all the screamers.)

Who was the real terrorist in Ontario’s divorce-arbitration kerfuffle? Surprise: Not the Muslims. It was the screamers. They hijacked the debate with fear, loathing, and ultimately, sabotage. How very civilized, humanistic and Western of them! What a great example to the Muslims of the world…in how NOT to do things. It also must have confirmed every one of their suspicions that we are just as xenophobic and bigoted up here as any redneck south of the 49th Parallel. Not exactly a point of pride for any of us, unless you’re a screamer–in which case you’re chronically oblivious to how much of a shit you look to everyone else.

And all this screaming came out of the woodwork after 19 men crashed some jets on a bright September day. Just 19 of them, and what a panic they unleashed. It’s crazy! The truth should be head-thumpingly obvious: The overwhelming majority of Muslims are not terrorists. But they are all being treated as terrorists by our government, and 9-11 is to blame. The fires of 9-11 have blinded half the world to what the other half is really thinking.

It doesn’t help, either, when our government or its agents, in their zeal to root out terror plots, actually end up helping to foment them. They have done it either directly, as in the case of a group of misguided young men who planned a local 9-11, or indirectly, as when they agreed to go along with NATO and fight Unocal’s pipeline wars in Afghanistan (thereby putting us on the shit list of precisely such groups as the one I just mentioned). Whether as entrappers or entrappees, our government just embarrasses the hell out of me whenever it pulls this thoughtless crap.

But what embarrasses me most is when our government willfully permits Canadian citizens, who just happen to be Muslim, to be abused abroad. Every one of the four Canadians I mentioned earlier was subjected to maltreatment ranging from unlawful imprisonment to torture. And had they been white Christians, it is very doubtful that they would have gone through any of that. Whatever one thinks of Islam (and I for one am very uncomfortable with the brand subscribed to by Omar Khadr’s bat-shit crazy family, and relieved to know that it is actually very uncommon), one ought to realize that tolerating the imprisonment and torture of others simply because they’re of a different religion is to perpetrate the same form of persecution that you are accusing that religion of doing!

And when you start with the persecution of one religion, where does it all end? You’ll notice that on the t-shirt I posted above, there are symbols of not only Islam, but most of the world’s other religions as well. There’s a good reason for that.

Shortly after 9-11, the Hindu Samaj Temple in Hamilton, Ontario, was fire-bombed. Apparently the vandals who bombed it mistook it for a Muslim mosque. The fact that Hinduism and Islam have very little in common was no deterrent to the bombers–they saw brownish people in baggy clothing wandering in and out, and since the place looked faintly “exotic” and Eastern, well, what more reason did they need? Any religion that didn’t conform to the Judeo-Christian canon was automatically suspect. A clearer case of panic-driven religious persecution would be hard to find.

And Hindus were not the only non-Islamic religious group to suffer. Sikhs also bore the brunt of the hysteria, thanks to the fact that traditionalist Sikh men wear turbans. And Jerry Falwell blamed pagans–uh, that would include little red-haired Wiccan ME–for angering God into “letting” 9-11 happen! I have icons and scriptures of many different religions kicking around my place. So you can kind of see why I’d get touchy enough to buy a shirt like that, eh?

And of course, me also being a Bad German, I’m
rather keen on what Pastor Niemöller said. It was true then, and it’s still true now; just substitute “Muslim” for “Jew”.

Have we really progressed so little since the Middle Ages that we let this prejudice blind us to the rights of Muslim Canadians? I hope not. But with the way my own government has been acting (or NOT acting) toward them, I think you could forgive me for not holding my head as high as I’d like to (even when I’m wearing my bad-ass shirt). This selective blindness to injustice against Canadians abroad shames us all. And it shames us all as Canadians.

PS: Great minds, etc.

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Canadian Counterpunch, Confessions of a Bad German, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land, The War on Terra | 2 Comments

Most racist country in Latin America is…

most-racist-award.jpg

…PERU! Where shit like this gets published in “respectable” newspapers, no less:

So now you know. For those of you who still think of these ‘ethnic groups’ as ‘good’, ‘naïve’ and ‘pure’, I’ll remind you that it was these same people who perfected the art of shrinking the heads of their enemies and wearing them on the belts holding up their loincloths. They couldn’t do that with Congress. Their heads couldn’t be shrunk any more than they already are. Anyway, if the ‘natives’ didn’t shrink the heads of the policemen they killed and eat their remains, it was only because there wasn’t time.

Not only that, these chunchos – who I’ve seen wearing well-made Lacoste t-shirts and polo shirts, as well as Adidas trainers – say that oil – which belongs to all Peruvians – shouldn’t be exploited if it lies under what they call ‘their’ land. What a cheek! They’re against logging for the same reason. And to cap it all, they don’t want to pay taxes. Perfect! What do these policeman-murdering wretches think that the factories whose products they wear run on? Water? How do they think the medicines and hospitals, which you demand free-of-charge, are produced? As far as I’m concerned, they can get f**k*d, loincloths and all!

BTW, this isn’t Correo’s first offence. Check out what they had to say about a Quechua member of the Peruvian parliament. (They also have a history of printing their racist drivel without bylines, I see. Bad form, par for the course of bad journalism!)

Yep, they’ve really come a long way in Peru. The government has no qualms about driving people off their own land if there’s oil underneath it; the murder and highway robbery gets excused with blahblah like “The oil belongs to all Peruvians” (except the indigenous, whom the tyrant president himself says are not real people.) The indigenous no longer shrink heads; now, the shrunken heads all sit on the shoulders of white so-called journalists who write blatantly racist EXCREMENT like the excerpt above, and they are shrunken by other whites who seriously believe that the native tribes know no more than 80 words apiece. (I’m not shitting. You can read the whole thing here; it gets no better as it goes along.)

Muchas gracias to Matt H. for the heads-up (no pun intended). As for the unnamed writer of the dreck, there’s a special award for you, pal:

four-word-stfu.jpg

Or if you can’t do that, man up and put your name to it, so readers can see whose head to call for. (Pun very much intended.)

Share this story:
Posted in Crapagandarati, Fascism Without Swastikas, Inca Dink-a-Doo | 3 Comments