…because you won’t want to blink and miss the latest farce the CIA and the Venezuelan oppos are cooking up:
Oh look, there’s a gun in that little plus sign. Do you think they’re tipping their hand as to how they mean to “minus” him?
…because you won’t want to blink and miss the latest farce the CIA and the Venezuelan oppos are cooking up:
Oh look, there’s a gun in that little plus sign. Do you think they’re tipping their hand as to how they mean to “minus” him?

Of course, this bland logic completely skips over the fact that the Tories tend to woo the rich corporatist types, who count on them to push through “reforms” that benefit only one small sector of society–THEMSELVES.It also ignores something else:When Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s attempt to cut off political party subsidies last year led to a very close brush with defeat, one might have thought the vote-tax debate would be dead and buried.Think again.It appears Manitoba cabinet minister Steven Fletcher has been tasked with promoting the idea all over again.Fletcher — the minister of state for democratic reform — has been talking about gearing up to take on the vote tax again. He has indicated it is something his government still plans to pursue.“We believe that political parties should support themselves with people who voluntarily donate to whichever party they wish to support,” said Fletcher.
Meaning, guess who would stand to LOSE the next election?Now, I should come clean–I am not a Liberal voter. The current party is not the party of Pierre Trudeau, who patriated the Constitution and gave us our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These Liberals smell too much like Tory Lite. They are too centrist for me; too much talk and too little action on the social-issues front, and weak on the environment too (except for maybe Stéphane Dion, bless him and his dog, Kyoto.) I’ve been voting NDP for the past decade or so because they’re the ones with the best combo of red and green. And yes, I’ve done it with the full awareness that they tend to split the progressive vote (oh, like the Greens don’t?) and enable the Tories, as vote-splitting in Germany did for a certain Austrian PFC in Germany during the 1930s, to be first past the post despite losing the popular vote. If nothing else, voting NDP gives me a chance to say “Look, this Lib/Con duopoly is a farce–and here are the alternative votes to prove it.” Besides, I’ve voted Lib before–holding my nose the entire time. They still lost. That was it for me. Ever since then, I’ve voted my conscience.And if you think that protest-vote element is a waste, you’re missing more than just a few screws. The NDP have gained popularity, seats and even a new provincial government recently, and for anyone to claim they are only useful as a vote-splitter is to ignore the huge disaffectation that decade upon decade of red/blue spit-swapping and general inaction is generating. Add to that the ballooning Harper deficit, plus a recession (generated on Harpo’s watch, while he and his fundie-fruitcake parliament were busy hitching their wagon to Dubya’s death star), and the rising cost of living (gee, do you think privatization had anything to do with that?) and the poor quality of services received (ditto) and I’d say there’s something very important for Jack Layton and Co. to capitalize upon. It could be the 1930s all over again, when hard times turned a lot of minds not-so-lightly toward socialism. If they can firm up their progressive agenda beyond vague talk, they’d have a real fighting chance. They might even surprise everybody by collecting lots of mom-and-pop donations, Obama style (remember, Obama’s campaign folks were at the recent NDP convo in Halifax) and if that happened, it would be even worse news for the Tories–and Iggy, too, who is just Harpo Lite at the end of the day. So, what is to be done in the meantime? Well, if this bad penny comes up in Parliament again, I think we’ll be seeing something like this, only this time, in earnest:A year ago, the Liberal Party was absolutely reliant on the money from that allowance. The Liberals raised a little over $5.8 million in direct contributions but received $8.7 million in the per vote subsidy.The Conservatives, in comparison, raised $21 million in donations and $10.4 million came from the vote tax. Losing $10 million would hurt but they would still have had four times as much money as their nearest opponent.But with a new leader, a new fundraising plan and at least the appearance so far of a wider appeal with voters, the Liberals’ financial fortunes have improved. In the first two quarters of this year the Liberals already surpassed their 2008 fundraising totals, registering $5.9 million in donations with Elections Canada.Added to that, with the Liberals’ 2008 elections showing so dismal, they are bringing in far less in the per-vote subsidy because they got 800,000 fewer votes. In 2009, they will raise $7.2 million in the vote tax subsidy. If they raise another $4 million in the third and fourth quarters, they will no longer be as reliant on the vote tax money.
And this time, I don’t think our lovely and talented Governor-General will be in any mood to prorogue. Especially if hundreds of thousands of angry Canadians converge on Parliament HIll to ask, not so rhetorically, where the hell their votes have gone.Last November, you might remember, Conservative plans to cut off the per-vote subsidy which parties get led to a near meltdown of Parliament. The opposition parties accused the government of trying to use the threat of a recession to kill off its opponents by bankrupting them. Then the Liberals, NDP and Bloc banded together to form a coalition and were prepared to vote down the government and take over.
First, The Real News does an excellent job (as does Rep. Dennis Kucinich, the man who should have been president) of debunking those who claim Canadians are suffering under “state-mandated wait times”:
Now, a little something courtesy of Public Values:If a doctor can’t even take a patient’s pulse correctly, is that not grounds for him to lose his medical licence? If not, I don’t know what is.Maybe Canadians need to be allowed to vote for who gets to head the CMA, too.A new poll conducted by Nanos Research points to overwhelming support (86.2 percent) for strengthening public health care rather than expanding for-profit services. “With more than eight in ten Canadians supporting public solutions to make public healthcare stronger, there is compelling evidence that Canadians across all demographics would prefer a public over a for-profit healthcare system,” said Nik Nanos, President of Nanos Research. Nanos Research was commissioned on behalf of the Canadian Health Coalition (CHC) to conduct a random telephone survey of 1001 Canadians between April 25th and May 3rd. The margin of accuracy for a sample of 1,001 is ±3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.As well, the federal government just released its report: Healthy Canadians – A Federal Report on Comparable Health Indicators 2008. Its findings identically mirrored the CHC polling results. In that report, a leading indicator pointed to the fact that, “Most Canadians (85.2 percent) aged 15 years and older reported being ‘very satisfied’ or ‘somewhat satisfied’ with the way overall health care services were provided, unchanged from 2005.”“Throughout our campaign, Canadians have told us they want to keep our health care system public and to improve it with made-in-Canada solutions. They also have told us they flat-out reject Dr Ouellet’s proposal to provide us with American-style two-tier medicine. This poll certainly underlines that for us. Eighty-six percent is a significant portion of the population,” said Michael McBane, National Coordinator of the Canadian Health Coalition. “It is striking that Dr Ouellet could be so out-of-touch with the pulse of most Canadians.”
Especially if they’re in the hands of someone a serious gun collector misguidedly trusts:
So much for the notion that owning guns, lotsa guns, will protect you against robbery and murder. In the case of poor old Mr. Kuhn, guns were the motive for the murder. Since he knew and trusted his own killer, he never thought to use one against him. And now, that pricey gun collection is out there on the streets, wreaking God only knows how much havoc.Somehow, though, I just can’t see the NRA putting that on a bumper sticker.Retired attorney Carl Kuhn was 82 when he died at home, so no one doubted his sons when they said for public consumption that he had died of natural causes.But all the while, they knew that DuPage County detectives thought something was suspicious and had opened a homicide investigation. The house, near Bartlett in unincorporated DuPage County, appeared to have been ransacked, Assistant State’s Atty. Robert Berlin said.Sheriff’s investigators were interested in a phone call that Kuhn received earlier that day from Terry Bratcher, 43, an ex-con who had become close friends with his former attorney, often visiting the much older man’s house, working on his cars and taking him out to movies.Kuhn had become so close with his former client that Bratcher was welcome to enter Kuhn’s home without knocking, said Kuhn’s son Eric.On Tuesday, Bratcher and Keith Allen, 21, were facing murder charges, accused of smothering Kuhn with a pillow. The victim was an avid gun collector, and Allen and Bratcher took 43 guns during the home invasion Friday, officials said. The weapons were later found in Bratcher’s garage in West Chicago, authorities said.“My dad trusted him,” said Eric Kuhn, 47, the oldest of three sons. “The hardest part of this whole thing is this wasn’t someone who just wanted to steal my father’s guns or someone who just wanted money. … They didn’t kick open the door; my father opened it and let them in.”
Video in Spanish, but you can hear the English translation if you listen with earphones.He calls him “one of the greatest defenders of peace in the world.” Chomsky’s response is characteristically modest. But his analysis is as astute as ever–Venezuela is indeed showing what kind of better world is possible–and it’s confounding even the expectations of the bizmedia, who keep hollering that it’s going to collapse. And who keep having to eat their words while watching “model” economies tanking again and again, while Venezuela keeps going steadily upwards. I wonder if they’re going to misreport what Chavecito said about Galbraith again, and claim that he must be unstable because Chomsky is obviously alive and well and standing right next to him. If they do, it will be proof that THEY are unstable and not to be trusted to shape public opinion, because they can’t even report the facts accurately. (Not that you and I didn’t suspect as much already, eh reader?)

…along with a lengthy lecture on why pregnancy at 14 is NEVER a good idea.
“It is of course true that the human creature characteristically prides itself on its self-reliance. However, it would be more exact to say that the creature, knowing it can’t rely upon itself, would very much like to believe that it could and is consequently never at ease with itself until it can give a practical demonstration to some other such creature of how much it can rely upon itself. What’s more, those endowed with the least intelligence and those least sure of themselves are precisely those who seize upon the least opportunity to demonstrate their entitlement to some sort of certificate of prowess. One can observe the same phenomenon in the world of judo, whose devotees, every so often, feel the need to heave someone or other over their buttocks and smack them down on the ground. The least proficient of these dedicated cross-buttockers wander about their neighborhoods looking for someone, even someone not of their quaint fraternity, upon whose weaker person they can demonstrate their superiority in using their bottoms to sling the upright flat on their backs.”–Soseki Natsume, I Am a Cat
Mmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeoooooooooowwwwwwwwww…
Just be thankful they don’t have opposable thumbs, people. Just be thankful.Because if they did, this is what would happen:I can haz sk8brd skillz like kitteh, pls?
Now, why would they issue this “legal” disclaimer that urges people to destroy the message (which is ludicrous in light of the fact that hard drives tend to retain them unless the entire disk is expertly scrubbed)? And why the bogus “prohibition” language? This must be what’s known as Plausible Deniability. Which no doubt, comes in handy when you’re coyly calling for a coup:The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. Furthermore, the NSM is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the NSM’s views or opinions. Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this mail in error, please destroy the copy in your possession and notify: commander@newsaxon.org
Ha, ha–yeah, RIGHT. In yer dreams, fellas. You forget just what the crappy PFC from Braunau was really made of. His “example” began in violence and ended in suicide, remember? I hope you enjoy explaining it to the FBI. Assuming they haven’t got their hands full with Hal Fucking Turner. The SPLC is all over you guys already.In any event, this “privacy” disclaimer is useless. It’s a mailing list that anyone can join (and scammers can post to!), therefore you can assume it has about as much “privacy” attached as one of those notices with the tear-off phone numbers that one often finds stapled to hydro poles. In other words, the NSM88 is so toast. And I am so laughing.This email is not a calling for a putsch, revolution, or violence of any type, those types of actions will not be necessary; nonetheless, certain events will naturally occur and will need to be taken advantage of by all of us. (…)Gentlemen, for too long only one race has made gains in their freedom and survival. That race has not been ours. If you look at things objectively, you will see that all of you have been fighting a good fight but our race is losing ground at a very fast rate; Obama running for President is evidence of that. We have a great opportunity in front of us and we need to ensure it is recognized for what it is and can be. The Fuhrer made great strides by knowing when and where to put his foot down, what moves to make and we need to follow his example.