Music for a Sunday (Night): The heart of the restless kind

One for all my fellow stay-up-laters out there:

Move on…

Share this story:
Posted in Music for a Sunday | Comments Off on Music for a Sunday (Night): The heart of the restless kind

Mexican boxer brings down Donnie’s great white hope

Oh, this is just too good not to share:

And yes, I am totally feeling the Schadenfreude here.

Share this story:
Posted in Der Drumpf, Fascism Without Swastikas, Isn't It Ironic?, Karma 1, Dogma 0, Mexican Standoffs, Schadenfreude, The United States of Amnesia | Comments Off on Mexican boxer brings down Donnie’s great white hope

Want a good husband? Don’t marry a conservative. (Redux)

Further to yesterday’s post, here’s a little nugget that came up in my YouTube recommendations this morning:

Yeah, how about that Eric Fucking Greitens, eh? Kidnapping, sexual assault, privacy invasion, blackmail…about all he hasn’t done is knock over a liquor store and get caught with a dead kid naked under his desk. And he STILL has the chutzpah to dig in his heels and refuse to step down!

And oh yeah, he’s like one of those guys I talked about yesterday, too. Complete with the silent little wife and kids to help him build that “respectable” image:

Yes, that’s one of his actual campaign ads. Here’s another:

Cringeworthy, isn’t it? And it sure as hell has NOT aged well. Kind of like Eric himself, no?

And of course, the idiots he was pandering to with that sanitized image have fallen for it…hook, line and stinker:

Some evangelical leaders, who supported him in 2016 along with an overwhelming number of the state’s white evangelical voters, said they had maintained their support for the governor.

Brandon Park, the lead pastor at Connection Point, an evangelical church in Raytown, Mo., affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention, said he did not think Mr. Greitens should resign. He supports the governor’s anti-abortion positions, and he says evangelical Christians respect him for his policies. “I see a lot of these personal attacks both on Trump and Greitens as a way to take away attention from the ideals that matter most to evangelical Christians,” he said. “It does seem to be a little bit of a witch hunt.”

“Witch hunt”, Mr. Park? You really should look up the history behind that phrase. You’ll find that the original witch-hunts were all done by “good Christian” men like yourself, persecuting women (and half-grown girls) whom they perceived (or simply slandered) as sexually dangerous.

But I guess history’s not part of your Christian curriculum, is it? At least, not a comprehensive history. Because a comprehensive history would, at least, include a clear-eyed look at how sexually dangerous lecherous men are. Lecherous, self-righteous men.

Conservative men, in other words.

Share this story:
Posted in Der Drumpf, Do As I Say..., Fascism Without Swastikas, Fetus Fetishists, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Illegal?, Men Who Just Don't Get It, Pissing Jesus Off, Sick Frickin' Bastards, Teh Heterostoopid, The United States of Amnesia, Uppity Wimmin | Comments Off on Want a good husband? Don’t marry a conservative. (Redux)

Want a good husband? Don’t marry a conservative.

Farron Cousins has the data, which may or may not surprise you, depending:

Yeah, what a shocker, eh? Guys who moralize the loudest tend to have the most to hide in terms of immorality and hypocrisy. The more they preach something, the less they practice it. How else to explain that “pro-life” right-winger who thinks God forgives him for making his mistress get an abortion? Or that lovely “traditionalist” who recently imploded his entire fascist “workers’ party” by brawling with his father-in-law…because he was schtupping his mother-in-law? Or Donnie, who babbles a blue streak about Mexicans and other immigrants (the browner their skin, the worse their supposed morality) bringing rape and drugs with them when it’s pretty clear that he’s done both drugs AND sexual assault himself…multiple times?

It’s no surprise that men with “traditional” views on race, religion, crime and politics tend to be “traditional” in other ways, too. Remember this meme?

Yeah, that’s right. It’s the ol’ double standard. Women have to be “pure” and faithful, but men? They can fuck around to their widdle hearts’ content. Hey, it’s a Traditional Value!

Of course, if you’re married to a “traditional” man, but your own views are not so “traditional” (and yes, note the quotes, there for a reason), it can be a source of friction in the marriage. Why? It’s the hypocrisy, stupid! Hypocrisy is the basis of so much “tradition” that it isn’t even funny. “Traditional” men have a long-standing tradition of one thing in particular, and that’s ENTITLEMENT. (I put it in ALL SHOUTY CAPS so you can’t fail to notice it.) They think they’re entitled to Other Women on the side because they’re just too much of a man for just one woman. And because fucking around is what Traditional Manhood is all about.

But since a trad-man must also have an aura of respectability, that’s where the Long-Suffering Wifey must come in. It’s her job to stand there like a trophy, smiling dumbly while he humiliates her (and himself too, but her most of all). As long as she stands there by him, smiling, saying nothing, he can boff Playboy centrefolds and porn stars to his heart’s content, and no one will call him on it. Were she to suddenly get fed up, and file for divorce, he’d lose face even as she gains her dignity back. Dignity is a zero-sum game with trad-men. If a woman in their vicinity has any, even just a little wee bit, they suddenly have none themselves. And if she gathers herself up and removes herself from the equation, the trad-man is effectively “cucked”…even if no other man is in the picture.

Some might think it’s ironic that men with liberal (or much further leftist views) make better partners in general, and better husbands in particular. But it’s true: The more a man makes the effort to shed male chauvinism (otherwise known as “tradition”) and become a better, more egalitarian and humane soul, the less likely he is to end up cheating, lying, screwing around…and oh yeah, DIVORCED. Just something to consider when you’re looking for a mate. And something worth holding out for, and NOT “giving your political opposite a chance”, too.

Take it from a woman who’s dated her share of conservatoads in the (forlorn) hope of turning one into a prince: Your kiss is NOT magic. You’re never going to turn him into a good partner if he’s not one already. That guy who takes you for granted as his girlfriend, but never shows up for you because he’s too busy running around with other women? He’s gonna do that forever if you let him. The more you put up and shut up, the more you’re going to end up standing there like a fool, grinding your teeth into stumps, getting ulcers and heart disease. And oh yeah, not getting any younger.

Best thing to do with a guy like that is just walk away. Find someone else if you can, and if you can’t, remember: Better alone than in bad company.

Share this story:
Posted in Der Drumpf, Do As I Say..., Drrrrruuuugs, Fascism WITH Swastikas, Fascism Without Swastikas, Fetus Fetishists, Filthy Stinking Rich, Isn't It Ironic?, Men Who Just Don't Get It, Not So Compassionate Conservatism, Uppity Wimmin | Comments Off on Want a good husband? Don’t marry a conservative.

Why did Omar Mateen shoot up the Pulse nightclub?

Cenk Uygur has the facts, and they’re not what we’ve been hearing all this time:

And yes, he’s doing what all responsible journalists SHOULD do, which is retract the false parts of the story, and proceed to set the record straight.

So, what IS the straight story?

Well, for starters, “straight” is the operative word here. Omar Mateen wasn’t gay, or bi, or in the closet about it. He didn’t pick the Pulse nightclub for that reason, or even plain old homophobia, although he was repulsed (as are plenty of garden-variety ‘phobes) by the sight of two men kissing. But that wasn’t why he chose Pulse, of all places, to shoot up. It was a totally random pick, one that came up when he searched for nightclubs in Orlando. He was originally planning to make it Disneyworld, but decided against it because there was too much security for him to walk in with a gun. He chose Pulse, not because of any homosexual or homophobic reason, but because it was apt to contain lots of people. That is, lots of innocent, unsuspecting targets that he could mow down for maximum effect. That was the reason he searched for it. There were no searches for gay porn, or anything LGBT-related, on his computer. In fact, the only sexually explicit things he searched for were to do with older women — an unconventional, but still decidedly heterosexual interest. Far more relevant — and germane to the subject of terrorism — is the fact that he looked up Daesh a lot. Their motives and methods were what drove him.

As to the larger political implications of the story: It may be very tempting to be suddenly pro-war and pro-gun in knee-jerk reaction to this shooting, but it’s also highly inadvisable. War and guns, in fact, are what made this shooting inevitable. Were it not for the US of Amnesia’s meddling in Iraq and Syria, there would be no Daesh. They are products of the US of A, as much as guns and gun nuttery are. And as much as Omar Mateen also is.

The remedy for the problem must begin at home, and it must not be more of the same. No more war; no more guns. Nor should it be a police state, as Ferguson, Baltimore, and all the ugly incidents of police brutality against non-white people have shown us clearly. Racism and islamophobia are not the answers; they are the problems. The US is already crammed to the gills with all that; no wonder it’s a powder keg. The thing for the gay community to do is not to become, à la Milo Yeah-Nope, “dangerous” walking homophobic slurs, but to maintain their humanity and openness, same as always; after all, gay Muslims still exist, even if Omar Mateen was not one. They need a community. They need a social milieu to call their own. Guns won’t protect anyone who is vulnerable to terrorism; ask anyone who’s ever been shot by the cops by mistake for an actual terrorist shooter. Or ask anyone who’s been mown down by trucks in Europe. In the heat of the moment, a gun is as useless as a brick in the seat of your pants. More guns, more victims; the equation is direct and simple.

And if anyone in the US of Amnesia is serious about ending terrorism, at home and abroad, the thing to do is stop making wars. Stop sending guns. Stop, stop, stop, and pull back. US out of everywhere! It’s a simple lesson, and short enough to fit on one of their beloved bumper stickers, but it’s one they find awfully difficult, because they have yet to learn it.

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Cops Behaving Badly, Der Drumpf, Fascism Without Swastikas, Guns, Guns, Guns, If You REALLY Care, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Terrorism?, Law-Law Land, The United States of Amnesia, The War on Terra | Comments Off on Why did Omar Mateen shoot up the Pulse nightclub?

Are Dubya and his war criminals suddenly respectable?

You might be forgiven for thinking so, but Jimmy Dore doesn’t:

And neither do I. Dubya is still a dick, even if Donnie is a bigger one. David Fucking Frum may sound suddenly reasonable right now, but remember, he’s the crapagandist who authored the phrase “Axis of Evil” and rah-rahed BushCo into that fuckery in Iraq. And all of them, ALL OF THEM, are war criminals. STILL. That hasn’t changed. Just because Dubya’s fucked-up White House wasn’t as badly fucked up as Donnie’s, doesn’t mean that it was a model of statesmanship and reasonability. If anything, it was the forerunner of the current ungodly mess. And it set a bad precedent, just as Nixon’s did for Dubya & Co. Why the hell Ellen DeGeneres saw fit to dance with these guys, I don’t know. Just because some time has passed between that fuckery and this, is no reason to get nostalgic. Nothing has improved in the interim, and in fact it’s all gotten worse thanks to policies Dubya set in place. No respect is due, and no respectability should be granted. Period.

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, BushCo Death Watch, Crapagandarati, Der Drumpf, Fascism WITH Swastikas, Fascism Without Swastikas, Isn't It Ironic?, Newspeak is Nospeak, The United States of Amnesia, The War on Terra | Comments Off on Are Dubya and his war criminals suddenly respectable?

Alex Jones’s ex speaks out

I missed this video while my pute was in the shop, but I still think it’s worth posting:

What sort of person was Alex Jones behind the scenes? Well, according to his former wife, Kelly, he didn’t use to be a hardline, far-right personage…at least until he got a cash infusion from the Sinclair Broadcasting Corporation. Or a snake-oil salesman, either. And now he’s not only NOT the independent thinker he presents himself as, he’s also a professional charlatan and brainwasher, using the proceeds from that snake oil to keep her own kids away from her. And along the way, we learn just what’s wrong with the Texas family court system, and the judge hearing the case. It’s 25 minutes of must-hear information that should result in a massive boycott.

Share this story:
Posted in Crapagandarati, Fascism Without Swastikas, Filthy Stinking Rich, Freeze Peach!, Isn't It Ironic?, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land, The United States of Amnesia | Comments Off on Alex Jones’s ex speaks out

Quotable: Ursula K. Le Guin on gender-neutral pronouns

“I still dislike invented pronouns, but I now dislike them less than the so-called generic pronoun he/him/his, which does in fact exclude women from discourse; and which was an invention of male grammarians, for until the sixteenth century the English generic singular pronoun was they/them/their as it still is in English and American colloquial speech. It should be restored to the written language, and let the pedants and pundits squeak and gibber in the streets.”

— Ursula K. Le Guin, “Is Gender Necessary? Redux”

(So, there you have it. Jordan Fucking Peterson, you are and always have been dead WRONG. Please proceed to eat your fucking heart out.)

Share this story:
Posted in Men Who Just Don't Get It, Merry Old England, Quotable Notables, Uppity Wimmin | Comments Off on Quotable: Ursula K. Le Guin on gender-neutral pronouns

Did a recently caught gay serial killer also kill in the 1970s?

CBC’s The Fifth Estate examines Bruce McArthur and some still “unsolved” killings that took place in Toronto’s gay community as far back as the 1970s.

If you think the Seventies were a “swinging” time, you probably got that (largely false) impression from the media. If you actually remember it being that way for you personally, you might just be straight…or exceptionally well-connected and lucky. The victims of these murders were not so privileged. Public sentiment at the time was extremely homophobic; gay men were often beaten up or pelted with rocks in the streets, and police did little to stop it. Cops could and did arrest you if they caught you in the act of being openly and consensually gay; it was the law. Even just holding hands while walking with a same-sex partner was grounds for arrest. Bathhouse raids were commonplace up into the 1980s, as the AIDS crisis, which grew in the shadows of the closet (and its flipside, the de rigueur promiscuity of the clubs), fueled the hatred and resentment that gays were feeling already. It’s a little better now, but a strong undercurrent of hate still remains, often openly tapped by the likes of Ontario provincial premiership candidate Doug Ford, a very right-wing former Toronto city council member. The recent provincial Tory leadership race, in fact, was rife with ill-disguised homophobia; at least two of the candidates jockeying for the post made no efforts to hide theirs. And yes, the Toronto police are still arresting queers for queering it up where they can be too easily seen, such as certain public parks — a frequent “cruising” area for the closeted.

Which brings us current. Many of McArthur’s known victims were closeted themselves — married to women and even fathering children by them, but frequenting gay establishments on the sly. So were some of the gay murder victims of the 1970s, who have not yet been linked to any known perpetrator. And serial killers tend to start their criminal careers quite young — often starting with “lesser” crimes such as sexual assaults and/or animal torture and killings in their teens through mid-twenties, then “graduating” to human serial killing by their early thirties. Bruce McArthur is in his late sixties now, and has been living in and around the Toronto area for the past four decades at least. So, if he followed the typical serial killer pattern, that means he could have begun killing as early as 40-some years ago…and that means that a lot of these old “cold” cases could suddenly grow very hot indeed.

Share this story:
Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Cops Behaving Badly, Cops Behaving Better, Fascism Without Swastikas, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land, Not So Compassionate Conservatism, Teh Ghey | Comments Off on Did a recently caught gay serial killer also kill in the 1970s?

Ah’m back!

Yay! My computer is finally fixed. I have a working keyboard AND trackpad again. Regular posting to resume shortly. Meanwhile, shall we dance? I feel like dancing…

Share this story:
Posted in Technical Notes | Comments Off on Ah’m back!