This is why I do it, people

A few days ago, I wrote a letter to three members of Parliament–three women who had the courage to vote against the Tories’ shameful motion to scrap the long-gun registry, and to protest the mere lip service paid to the victims of December 6. Here’s what I wrote to them:

Just wanted to say thank you…

…for not supporting the Tories’ mockery of women on Tuesday. I was a student at Queen’s University at the same time the Montreal Massacre occurred, and it shook me to my core. It also confirmed for me that there is still a crying need for feminism, and that women’s rights are by no means a done deal.

It also confirmed for me that we need gun control–MORE, not less. If residences and motor vehicles are all registered, there is no reason why firearms, whose sole purpose is to be used for killing, should not also be.

Once more, THANK YOU!

Today I heard back from one of them:

Dear Sabina,

Thank you so much for your email message. As I’m sure you understand, the day of the vote was very diificult. Your kind words helped and I appreciate that kindness very much. You are the next generation of activists; we will need you in the struggle for equality and justice.

In Solidarity,

Irene

Why do we do these seemingly futile things? Because we know they are not futile even if there is a momentary setback. Notice has been served to other members of Parliament: The gun registry is popular with ordinary Canadians. Especially the women over 40, who, like me, have personal memories of what it was like to be terrorized in the wake of the Montréal Massacre–a terror that went deeper than 9-11 ever could.

Share this story:
Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Guns, Guns, Guns, Uppity Wimmin | 3 Comments

Smart on crime means tough on Tories

Don’t know who made this video, but I can totally get behind it. It’s bang-on…on every point.

Share this story:
Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Fascism Without Swastikas, Guns, Guns, Guns, Law-Law Land, Not So Compassionate Conservatism, Sick Frickin' Bastards, The "Well, DUH!" Files | 2 Comments

Short ‘n’ Stubby: Montréal memorial edition

calico-manx.jpg

CBC devotes an hour of its Sunday radio edition to voices of the Montréal Massacre. Among the interviewees are gun-control activist and engineer Heidi Rathjen, who was a student at the Polytechnique at the time and heard the gunshots from another room; also Brian Vallée, Francine Pelletier, and many more. It’s the second hour of the program; scroll down for the sound link.

CTV’s interview with Monique Lépine, the mother of the killer, is a don’t-miss one. She lost two children to the Massacre; her daughter also committed suicide, seven years later. She herself decided to live, tell her story, reach out to survivors, and stop suffering in silence. Her quest for truth helped her to survive the unimaginable. Her worst memory of her son is that he was “too secret”–a telling fact. Secretiveness means something to hide. She herself has nothing to hide anymore, and her courage is amazing.

So, feminism’s work is done? Not according to the findings of this professor, who finds that women’s enrollment in engineering programs at university is dropping. It’s not that women can’t do the work–many can, do, and love it. They are disproportionately ahead of the males, marks-wise. So what is it? Nobody wants to confront the fact that a terrorist act of 20 years ago has a long shadow, so it’s still being treated as a mystery. Which is for me the worst legacy of the massacre–the constant silencing of its true impact.

So, misogyny isn’t a problem? Read this right through to the end and then tell me it’s not. Every woman who ever voices an unconventional opinion will sooner or later get referred to–inevitably, by a male–using derogatory terms for her own genitalia. It’s happened to me, and it sickens me every time. Of course, it’s meant to. It’s meant to drive home the notion that you, a woman, are dirty, disgusting and disposable. If that’s not woman-hating, I don’t know what is.

So, gun owners are inconvenienced by having to register their weapons? They feel stigmatized and demonized? Boo fucking hoo. The families of gun violence victims have something much bigger to cope with than a mere momentary inconvenience. Wendy Cukier takes on the need to defend gun control. Her arguments hold a lot more water than those of her detractors. That’s because she doesn’t believe in loopholes, duh.

Are there men out there who understand this whole business? Yes, yes, and yes. More like them, please!

Barb Gustafson asks a pertinent question, and fights other people’s stereotype of what a feminist is. So does Angela McIsaac, who asserts that no, we haven’t forgotten the lessons of that day–and yes, she’s still fighting for women’s equality. As we all should be.

Nathalie Provost, a survivor, thought she wasn’t a feminist back then. Now she’s changed her mind–and helping other women change theirs, too.

Judy Rebick dares to call the Massacre by its right name: terrorism.

Share this story:
Posted in Short 'n' Stubby, Uppity Wimmin | Comments Off on Short ‘n’ Stubby: Montréal memorial edition

Honduras: “Clean” elections officially a fraud

The Real News explains it clearly and in great detail. Less than 40% participation is NOT a flood of support–it is massive abstention!

Shame on Graeme Clark for falling for the sham. Shame, too, on anyone who gave this farce a moment’s credence. Especially the English-language mainstream media, who are all so damn lazy and such piss-poor reporters that they take Gorilletti’s claims at face value even when they are phony on the face of them!

For some more interesting details on just how democratic this whole process wasn’t, check out the latest from Honduras Coup 2009 and BoRev.

Share this story:
Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, Crapagandarati, Newspeak is Nospeak, Not Hiding in Honduras | Comments Off on Honduras: “Clean” elections officially a fraud

Remembering the Montréal Massacre, 20 years later

montreal-victims.jpg

The fatal victims of the Montréal Massacre of December 6, 1989. Top row, left to right: Anne-Marie Edward, Anne-Marie Lemay, Annie St.-Arneault, Annie Turcotte, Barbara Daigneault, Barbara Maria Klucznik, Geneviève Bergeron

Bottom row: Hélène Colgan, Maryse Leclaire, Maryse Laganière, Maud Haviernick, Michèle Richard, Nathalie Croteau, Sonia Pelletier

20 years ago, I was a student at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario. I was also a volunteer at the university women’s centre.

I say “volunteer”, but truthfully, there wasn’t much to do there, even if there was a lot of will to do things on the part of that one little clutch of women. The late 1980s were something of a black hole for feminism. A lot of people thought that the main goals of the movement had been achieved, and that what was left of the movement had to be nothing but a bunch of radical, man-hating lesbians who didn’t shave their legs.

We knew it wasn’t like that. We had some lesbians, yes–and some radicals, yes. But we weren’t all lesbians, or even all that radical. And man-haters? Definitely not. I’m straight, and my best friend is a gay man; my radicalism was then a work in progress (still is). For the most part, we were just women, trying to raise awareness of the issues and to gain full justice for our gender. Leg-shaving wasn’t even an issue with us. There was too much else going on, most of it flying completely under most people’s radar.

Access to safe legal abortions was and still is under fire from the far-right here in Canada. AIDS, too, was fast becoming an issue for heterosexual women; today, they are the fastest-growing group of HIV-infected persons. And domestic violence hadn’t exactly gone away, either. Date rape, usually involving alcohol and/or drugs, was a growing problem, particularly on university campuses (it’s even worse now.) And working women had yet to earn more than 65 cents to a man’s dollar (they still haven’t come anywhere near 65 cents today, either). Male students on our campus mocked an anti-date-rape campaign with window signs reading “NO MEANS MORE BEER”, “NO MEANS SHE’S A DYKE”, “NO MEANS KICK HER IN THE TEETH”, and other equally charming sentiments. These were the things we concerned ourselves with, back in the dying days of the smug, complacent 1980s.

But that smugness and complacency were all-enveloping, even stifling. Apathy was about the only thing that ran rampant on our campus, other than hordes of drunken, purple-dyed engineers during Frosh Week. For that reason, we felt isolated. (Isolation is an oppression unto itself.) There wasn’t much to do at the centre, other than log the occasional incoming phone call, or help a rare visitor check out a book from the centre’s tiny library. Most of my time there I spent reading those books myself, contributing to my informal education with an undeclared minor in women’s studies. Often I found myself wondering when and if I would ever get to put this newfound knowledge to use. More often, it felt like just a small group of women, maybe a dozen in all, that got together to socialize now and then, and talk politics rather than family over the dinner table.

I remember one potluck dinner we had, when I drank too many glasses of wine and walked euphorically home in minus-20 weather without my hat and gloves, and with my coat undone, thinking what fun it had been, what amazing women they all were, and how great and strange it was that I couldn’t feel the cold. I walked alone, not the least bit scared–it’s easy to take back the night when the streets are deserted anyway! Later, when I got into bed, I had something worse than the bed-spins: I found myself unable to breathe in the warm, stuffy room. I kept myself awake that night with gruesome thoughts, reminding myself to breathe, and breathe, and breathe. Not so euphoric, after all.

But that night paled in comparison to something else that happened later on.

In the early morning hours of December 6, 1989, I had a particularly vivid and baffling dream. In it, I was with a group of women, and we were all wearing beautiful dresses in various bright colors, with beaded trim, and wreaths of silk flowers in our hair. We were dancing in circles around a silver fountain in some indoor atrium, to electronic pop music. Suddenly, the record stuck. Then came a rapid-fire banging noise, that at first sounded like part of the song’s beat, but wasn’t. It was gunshots. The women scattered in panic and hid. Then another song began to play–“The First Noel”. The women came out of hiding again, but this time, very solemnly, they gathered around the fountain in little clusters, with their arms around each other. I looked and saw that some of the women were wearing badges of a purple fabric with some indistinct crest embroidered on it in gold and silver thread, and was told that this was the symbol of feminist mourning.

Then I woke up.

I wrote the dream down in my diary, then promptly forgot about it and just went on with my day as usual: breakfast, classes, lunch, more classes, supper. By that time I was so caught up in my end-of-semester essays (ah, the joys of being an English major!) that I had completely forgotten my dream. I settled down on the couch to read a bit and scratch out some notes before heading to my typewriter.

Then the phone rang. It was Bridget, a fellow volunteer at the Women’s Centre. She told me something that ran through me like a lightning bolt: A gunman had opened fire at a Montréal university, and fourteen people were dead. All were women. Apparently the man had separated the people in the room by gender before opening fire, claiming he was at war against feminists. Those were his words, in French. Je lutte contre les feministes!

I walked to my bedroom in a daze. I lit the candle on the little goddess-altar I had built on my dresser, then sank to the floor in shock. Fourteen women dead–for being “feminists”!

And it had happened at a university.

I was in university.

It could have happened anywhere.

It could have happened here.

It could have been any woman.

It could have been me.

I walked around in limbo for several days after that. I don’t remember much of what I did then, only that I attended a vigil in one of the big lecture halls. There was a space down in front that was women-only, and I sat there. It wasn’t some radical separatist thing; it was a need for the comfort of my own, my sisters. Someone tied a scrap of purple fabric–sweatsuit fleece, by the looks of it–around the sleeve of my coat.

The badge of feminist mourning.

The woman next to me was young and pretty, a student too. I knew her only vaguely as the friend of a friend; her name, I think, was Robin. She was rather short and plump, with honey-colored hair and a friendly, roundish face; she wore glasses. She took my hand, and then she said something surprising, innocent and utterly heartbreaking all at once: Your hands are so small!

I began to cry. And I thought, irrationally but still relevantly: Yes, my hands are so small–and that’s just the problem, isn’t it?

A muted soprano chorus rose up from the crowd: We are sad and grieving women, and we are singing, singing for our lives…

I joined the singing.

She held my hand throughout the service, and in the end it was strange, if small, comfort. A comfort to know that I wasn’t so alone in the struggle now, that even the most complacent had been shocked awake, but a sad, cold comfort too, because fourteen women had to die in order to prove that we feminists were right–there was still so much to do!

And yes, there still is. Twenty years later,
it’s an ugly thought that we still have so much fighting left to do. Tiring, depressing–haven’t we been through all this shit? Why aren’t we done with it yet? Why so much more, still, now?

The Spanish word for struggle is lucha. More accurately, la lucha. It’s feminine. In some parts of Latin America, Lucha is even a woman’s name. Struggle, in other words, is a woman.

Es larga, la lucha. The struggle is long.

This, then, is our struggle, and that of all women:

Fourteen women died just because they were women, at the hands of a violent loser who was pissed because he couldn’t make it into engineering school, 20 years ago. He wasn’t smart enough, but he blamed women for his own failure. We hold memorial services, very lovely ones too, but do we really remember what it’s all about?

Or do we do this to silence what we really ought to remember?

Not enough has changed since then, and what has changed, is constantly under fire–literally–from the forces of conservatism. There is now talk of scrapping the long-gun registry, which women fought for in the wake of the Montréal Massacre. Never mind that police chiefs like it, and even a lot of gun owners understand that it’s no worse than a motor-vehicle registry. No, the conservatives think it’s too much of a bother to keep it, just as it’s too much of a bother to keep the Status of Women committee properly funded (and run by someone other than cock-sucking toadies). The conservatives are always out to fuck us over, and who gets it in the neck first? Yep–women. Same as it ever was…

Conservatism is a luxury, affordable only for the complacent, the apathetic, the ignorant. The ones who are doing all right, because they’ve got theirs, jack. It’s telling that men go that way a lot more than women as they get older. That’s because they can afford to. They still make 40 cents more on the dollar than we do! It might as well be 1959, from where we women sit. At least, back then, a dollar–or a woman’s 60 cents–went further. Thanks so much for the phony liberation, capitalists! You can keep your fucking Virginia Slims, this “baby” hasn’t come a long way at all.

Yoko Ono was right; we are the niggers of the world. Black, brown, yellow, white–whatever our color, we women are the underclass in every class we occupy. We’ve gone from slavery to sharecropping, and even now, we’re still stuck in the ghetto, making less than a man but paying more. Can anyone honestly say we are not worth 3/5 of a man when they remember that we’re just making 61 cents to a man’s dollar after all this time? That’s negritude for ya, baby.

We got the vote, but do we get what we vote for? And when we get it, do we get to keep it? And can you believe that here in Canada, we were not even considered persons until 1929? And that after all this time, there are still a shitload of crabby old coots–conservatives, in other words–who think that what little we get is entirely too much for us?

When a man gets beaten up, chances are that it’s by another man, and that there is nothing sexual or gender-based in the violence. Women? Well, let’s put it this way–it’s rarely another woman who beats them up. Just as it’s rarely a woman who beats up a man. The bulk of violence women face is distinctly gender-based, and it is directed against them, just because they are women. Worse, our culture glorifies it even more now than it did back then. In fact, a lot of people–some of them women!–will even say we had it coming, because we supposedly got too damn uppity for our own good. If only we’d stayed home, baking cookies and popping babies out of the oven like we women are supposed to (according to the female misogynist group called R.E.A.L. Women), none of this would happen…

Except it does happen to women who stay home. In fact, those are the worst-abused ones of all. Their submission grants them no protection from the violence, the misogyny and often, the alcoholism of their men. This kind of “traditional” family plays hell on the children. Just ask Patrick Stewart. Yes, TV’s super-rational Captain Picard is the son of a battered housewife and an alcoholic father! Who knew?

Oh, only the world’s long-suffering millions of women. We know all about that. But who listens to us? Whenever we say something about it, even if we’re polite and apologetic and not offensive in the least, we get beaten down with derisive cries of “man-hating lesbian bitch”. Even our own sisters shout us down!

Well, fuck that shit.

Nothing will ever get done about anything if no one raises hell. So why not us women? After all, we live in it every day. I’m getting more radical, not less, with age–and I don’t care how many wimps and losers I scare off with it. The revolution, la revolución, oh look, another woman–is not for wusses. My hands may be small, but they’re full of rocks, and I can hurl them a lot better now. I’ve had lots of time in which to do it.

Es larga, la lucha. The struggle is long. But I’m just getting started.

It’s been twenty years now, and my tears are still not dry.

montreal-memorial.jpg

Share this story:
Posted in Canadian Counterpunch, If You REALLY Care, Uppity Wimmin | 5 Comments

Music for a Sunday: A beautiful song for Bolivia

I thought this was only fitting, since today’s election day down thataway. This should capture the festive spirit nicely, no?

Viva Bolivia, viva Evo, viva Alvaro.

Share this story:
Posted in All About Evo, Music for a Sunday | 4 Comments

Economics for Dummies: What Chavecito’s bank moves really mean

fugitive-ven-banksters.jpg

“Let’s get outta here, buddy–now Chávez is starting in on us, the honest bankers!”

And for those who wanna know what they’re referring to, here ya go. Enjoy!

Share this story:
Posted in Economics for Dummies, Filthy Stinking Rich, Huguito Chavecito, Isn't That Illegal?, Law-Law Land | Comments Off on Economics for Dummies: What Chavecito’s bank moves really mean

Yes, we CAN…haz torture inquiry

canada-tastes-good.jpg

If you wanna know why I’m happy, read what Jack Layton sent me today:

Parliament passes NDP motion for an Inquiry on torture allegations

Thank you for your email concerning the recent allegations of prisoner

torture in Afghanistan. I am providing this update on our efforts to get

to the bottom of the allegations.

On December 1, Parliament agreed to pass the motion by New Democrat

Foreign Affairs critic Paul Dewar calling for a public inquiry over the

torture allegations. From the start, our Party believed that a public

inquiry was needed. We welcome the support of the other opposition

parties who agree with our position.

It’s now up to the Harper Conservatives to do the right thing. In

opposition, Mr. Harper spoke of a government’s moral responsibility to

respect the will of Parliament, because it was ultimately the democratic

will of Canadians. We want his government to be guided by these words

and to set-up this public inquiry.

Please find attached my speech in Parliament in support of my

colleague’s motion and you can visit the following link to read the text

of the full debate:

LINK 1

Canadians are understandably upset that there is a reluctance to take

responsibility for these allegations. Transferring detainees to those

whom are likely to torture them is a violation of international law.

However, the Conservative government continues to dodge and dismiss all

concerns about the treatment of prisoners. They’ve concealed evidence,

intimidated witnesses and obstructed the Military Police Complaints

Commission inquiry. We even heard from three Generals who told the

Afghanistan special committee that it wasn’t their job to follow up on

the condition of detainees after they were handed over to Afghan

authorities.

It is clear that an inquiry is needed. Mr. Colvin’s revelations deserve

to be fully examined. And, if required, the appropriate people should

be held responsible.

New Democrats have been raising concerns about prisoner transfers in

Afghanistan since 2006. For more information, please refer to:

LINK 2

Again, I appreciate hearing from you. Feel free to share my response

with anyone who may be interested. All the best.

Sincerely,

Jack Layton, MP (Toronto-Danforth)

Leader, Canada’s New Democrats

There you have it. A little triumph for real Canadians today.

Share this story:
Posted in Angry Pacifist Speaks Her Mind, Canadian Counterpunch, If You REALLY Care, Law-Law Land, The War on Terra | 4 Comments

Wankers of the Week: Hands Off edition

stop-wanking.jpg

Yes, kiddies, it’s that time of the week again…the time where we tell people to take it off the street and stop scaring the horses. Here’s who needs to unhand their genitalia this week, prontissimo:

1. Ian Fucking Kelly. Not only is he a wanker, he’s delusional. And he really needs to stop sharing his sexual fantasies regarding Honduras. They’re squicking the real Hondurans out!

2. Helena Fucking Guergis. Making a mockery of the Montreal Massacre in Parliament while depriving the Status of Women office of funding? Stay classy, Helena. Better still, just keep your fingers off the trappings of feminism. You’re not worthy to talk about what’s “above partisan games”, especially when your own party is the one playing the game so dirty.

2 1/2. Candice Fucking Hoeppner is also worth a dishonorable mention.

3. The entire fucking Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Disrupting the due process of justice by faking sick on days they have to appear in court, of all times? That’s a major, major wank. That’s also contempt. I say they should do time the way Sheriff Joe Fucking Arpaio makes prisoners do!

4. Ann Fucking Coulter. Yeah, I know: The Coultergeist is a wanker all the time. What makes her a particularly noteworthy one right now? Take your pick of all the countless dumb-bombs she drops during the interview at the link. My personal fave was the moronic assertion that all presidential assassins were liberals. Oh yeah, because liberals just love to play with guns at tea parties where they wave threatening placards, eh Ann?

5. and 6.Rush Fucking Limbaugh and Glenn Fucking Beck. Most influential conservatives? Biggest fucking wankers EVER, is more like it.

birther-victory.jpg

7. Javier Fucking Lozano Barragan. So queers won’t enter heaven, says yet another queeny old man in a red gown? How the fuck does HE know? Too busy making life on Earth hell for them to even see them as human, I guess. PS: nice job of crediting other sources for your homophobia, bub.

8. Tiger Fucking Woods. A “wholesome” phony all along? Say it ain’t so! Never mind who he’s screwing in private, he’s fucking with everyone in public. Suddenly, we have an inkling of why Chavecito, Fidel and Che mocked the world’s most bourgeois (and grossly overrated) “sport”, eh?

golfers-why-complaining.jpg

9. Jacob Fucking Zuma. It takes a village to renovate a house…at least if you’re a polygamist masquerading as a president in South Africa. And while fellow South Africans are forced to do without such basics as electricity, water, phone service and affordable healthcare, he makes the taxpayer foot the bill, too. There just are no words for the ineffable charm…

10. Silvio Fucking Berlusconi. He wuz mobbed up all along? I’m shocked. SHOCKED, I tellz ya…

berlusconi-bothersome.jpg

11. Lanny Fucking Davis. His latest bloviation is blatantly inaccurate and stupidly self-serving. Suffice to say he doesn’t know where the centre is, much less the left. Both he AND Obama are now plainly on the right, and they are the only ones who don’t know it yet. (Suddenly we all know why Bill Ayers is protesting, eh?)

12. Sarah Fucking Palin. How many wanks this week? I’ve lost count, again. Even bigger wankers, however, are those who want this idiotess to run in 2012. At that rate, the world WILL end, no doubt about it.

13. Rudy Fucking Giuliani. Rio wants him to come down and help them fight crime? They forget on whose watch 9-11 happened. Remember that day when police and firefighters died because they simply couldn’t talk to one another–they didn’t have an effective radio system? That death came courtesy of their cheap-ass mayor. Who now shamelessly exploits that day to deflect criticism over everything from his own character flaws to those of his mafia pals, such as Bernie Fucking Kerik.

rudy-giuliani-noun-verb.jpg

14. Glenda Fucking Stone. Anyone besides me find it ironic that “Labour‘s ambassador for women at work” gives her (female) assistants such a hard time that their desk is referred to as “the revolving door”? Surely there aren’t that many bad personal assistants in Britain. Must be the boss, then. PS to Glenda: Don’t wear glittery strapless dresses, they don’t suit you.

15. Manuel Fucking Rosales. Oh look, Burusas the Bandit is masturbating before the Hudson Institute in Washington! Why, oh WHY am I not surprised that he’d whip it out in there?

And finally, the Pest from Buda. Take a hint and stay away if you don’t like what’s being said here. Don’t come back to play with your privates. I’m not interested in your drama.

Good night, and get fucked.

Share this story:
Posted in Wankers of the Week | 2 Comments

Short ‘n’ Stubby: Subversives-R-Us

calico-manx.jpg

Interesting (and disturbing) truths have come to light about CBS and McCarthyism. Who knew that a blacklister could win a civil rights award? This is right up there with Elia Kazan being honored after naming names. (Thanks to King Daevid for that one.)

Víctor Jara finally received due honors in his native Chile today. Cause of death: “Subversion”. Jara, a card-carrying communist, supported socialist president Salvador Allende (also murdered for “subversion”). 44 bullets and two destroyed hands–that’s a lot of hate for one man’s freedom of speech.

Human rights observer Lisa Sullivan commits the ultimate subversion: she reports truthfully on what’s really going on in “democratic” Honduras.

Oh noes, Chavecito has called for a fifth Socialist International! Gonna take a lot more than an ice-pick murder to stop this one…

And how’s this for subversive and communistic? FEDECAMARAS, the Venezuelan bosses’ federation that conspired with the military high command and corrupt trade unionists in 2002 to topple Chavecito…has come out in support of his interventions in the banking sector. Chavecito called for intervention in four banks, and liquidation of two more, for failing to comply with Venezuelan legal norms–and FEDECAMARAS is okay with that? Sky falling, film at 11!

Share this story:
Posted in Short 'n' Stubby | Comments Off on Short ‘n’ Stubby: Subversives-R-Us